Teams

No Strings Attached

2023 Baltimore Adult 18 & Over · Baltimore Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-07-07vs Volley GirlsWon 10
W#2 DoublesD Michelle Cooper / Bernadette Burger vs Claire Taylor / Kathy Sevy6-3, 7-6
2023-06-17vs Volley GirlsLost 01
L#1 SinglesChristine Hammann vs Dunia Sires2-6, 7-5, 0-1
2023-06-02vs Volley GirlsWon 20
W#1 DoublesJennifer Coles / Bernadette Burger vs Lena Brandenburg / Dianna Sinofsky6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesChristine Hammann vs Simone Bazos6-4
2023-05-31vs Volley GirlsSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMichele Brill / Christine Hammann vs Dunia Sires / Allison Stockbridge4-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesKeyonna Baker vs Dianna Sinofsky6-2, 6-2
2023-05-26vs Volley GirlsWon 21
L#1 DoublesSheri Mazurkevich / Colleen Begg vs Jennifer Rauhofer / Carisa Husak4-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesKeyonna Baker vs Dunia Sires6-2, 6-2
W#2 SinglesChristine Hammann vs Stephanie Saia6-0, 6-1
2023-05-21vs Volley GirlsWon 10
W#1 DoublesMichelle Bailey-Hedgepeth / Christine Hammann vs Carisa Husak / MELODY KELLY5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2023-05-18vs Volley GirlsLost 12
W#1 SinglesKeyonna Baker vs Stephanie Saia6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesBernadette Burger / Karen Vaughan vs Jennifer Rauhofer / Allison Stockbridge1-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesChristine Hammann vs Heather Nesti2-6, 7-6, 0-1
2023-05-12Won 10
W#1 SinglesChristine Hammann vs Stephanie Saia6-0, 6-0
2023-05-10Lost 01
L#2 DoublesColleen Begg / Leigh Williams vs Melinda Capone / MELODY KELLY1-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Baltimore Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.75 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.04
Keyonna Baker
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.90
2.81
Christine Hammann
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 36% · published 3
2.66
Bernadette Burger
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.58
Colleen Begg
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.52
Gail Lawson
published
Patrice Holtz
published
Sheri Mazurkevich
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Colleen Begg + Christine Hammann123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Keyonna Baker
165W–125L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%39%61%
3.04
3
Allison Steinmetz
4W–19L career · no lines in 2023
<1%76%24%
2.90
3
Christine Hammann
84W–47L career · 14 lines in 2023
1%90%9%
2.81
3
Bernadette Burger
56W–70L career · 3 lines in 2023
13%86%1%
2.66
3
Colleen Begg
35W–40L career · 2 lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
2.58
Gail Lawson
2W–14L career · no lines in 2023
44%56%<1%
2.52
Patrice Holtz
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sheri Mazurkevich
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.