Teams

Lanier/40/4.0/TRI/LCRC

2025 Lake Charles Tri Level 40 & Over - Women · 4.0,3.5,3.0 LC (40&O) Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.75 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-08-10vs Carlisle/40/4.0/TRI/LCRCLost 12
L#1 DoublesAmanda Brinkman / Laurie Herrera vs Melissa Padgett / Ana Denison1-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesCarrie Watkins / Crystal Pappion vs Stephannie Tanner / Audra Jackson3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMarlene Walker / Mona Hastings vs Melanie Ryan / Michelle Lee6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2025-08-03vs Carlisle/40/4.0/TRI/LCRCWon 21
L#1 DoublesAmanda Brinkman / Jackie Heinen vs Ana Denison / Stephannie Tanner3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCHARLOTTE ROAN / Julie Miller vs Audra Jackson / Vickie Anderson6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesPenny Duffy / Mary Theresa Miller vs Melanie Ryan / Michelle Lee6-4, 6-2
2025-08-03vs Carlisle/40/4.0/TRI/LCRCLost 12
L#1 DoublesLee Lanier / Jackie Heinen vs Melissa Padgett / Ana Denison3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesJulie Miller / Carrie Watkins vs Stephannie Tanner / Jennifer Istre2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMarlene Walker / Mona Hastings vs Amanda Ihli / Jessica Liles3-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0,3.5,3.0 LC (40&O) Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Amanda Brinkman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.79
Laurie Herrera
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
CHARLOTTE ROAN
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.75
Jackie Heinen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.70
Lee Lanier
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.29
Carrie Watkins
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Crystal Pappion
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.97
Penny Duffy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.94
Mary Theresa Miller
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.92
Marlene Walker
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.91
Mona Hastings
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Theresa Miller + Marlene Walker404 matchesnot enough data
Amanda Brinkman + Laurie Herrera213 matchesnot enough data
Marlene Walker + Mona Hastings123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Amanda Brinkman
11W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.84
Laurie Herrera
15W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%6%
3.79
4
CHARLOTTE ROAN
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Jackie Heinen
16W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.75
Lee Lanier
11W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
7%91%2%
3.70
3.5
Carrie Watkins
11W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Crystal Pappion
14W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
Penny Duffy
10W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
59%41%<1%
2.97
Mary Theresa Miller
12W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
67%33%<1%
2.94
Marlene Walker
23W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
2.92
Mona Hastings
27W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%73%26%
2.91

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.