Teams

Boulevard - Culumber

2024 IRMSL TriLevel 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 · Women - 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 - SatD

14 players · average NTRP 3.40 / REGION_6

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-08-24vs Harbour Ridge - WhittingtonLost 01
L#1 DoublesLeslie London / Rose Culumber vs Luisa Subia / Joyce Costopoulos4-6, 1-6
2024-08-17vs Harbour Ridge - WhittingtonWon 10
W#1 DoublesLauren Kushner / Leslie London vs Judy Zanchi / Sarah Murphy3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 DoublesLauren Kushner / Leslie London vs Carei Baratta / Lisa Thiesen6-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesCynthia Croom / Rachael McLaurin vs Elaine Byrket / Christie Mayer7-5, 6-0
2024-07-13vs Harbour Ridge - WhittingtonLost 01
L#1 DoublesKimberly Stewart / Leslie London vs Joyce Costopoulos / Tanya Mikel4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women - 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 - SatD have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.65
Rachael McLaurin
published
3.62
Leslie London
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.44
Lauren Kushner
published
3.34
Melissa Dean
published
3.33
Cynthia Croom
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Alana Hockenhull
published 3.5
Danette Bray
published 3.5
3.18
Nancy Barry
published
3.04
Elizabeth Beirne
published
2.92
Beth Kalish
published 3
2.88
Joan Dobravsky
published
2.87
Diane Mello
published 3.5
Michele Packard
published
Rose Culumber
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elizabeth Beirne + Beth Kalish5252% games+3.2% vs expected
Nancy Barry + Melissa Dean5067% gamesnot enough data
Elizabeth Beirne + Joan Dobravsky123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rachael McLaurin
5W–7L career · no lines in 2024
15%85%1%
3.65
Leslie London
47W–59L career · 4 lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
3.62
Lauren Kushner
0W–5L career · no lines in 2024
67%33%<1%
3.44
Melissa Dean
9W–6L career · no lines in 2024
1%87%12%
3.34
3.5
Cynthia Croom
54W–45L career · 1 line in 2024
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
Alana Hockenhull
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Danette Bray
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Nancy Barry
8W–10L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.18
Elizabeth Beirne
8W–9L career · no lines in 2024
38%62%<1%
3.04
3
Beth Kalish
18W–16L career · no lines in 2024
<1%71%28%
2.92
Joan Dobravsky
8W–15L career · no lines in 2024
<1%79%21%
2.88
3.5
Diane Mello
0W–5L career · no lines in 2024
83%17%<1%
2.87
Michele Packard
4W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Rose Culumber
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.