Teams

Ch.Waychoff18C

2025 Capital Combo 18 & Over · 5.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 2.88 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-09-14vs Cl.Owens18CLost 02
L#1 DoublesChristine Waychoff / Emily Palanzo vs Kendall Stevens / Courtney Hodgson4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesEllina Max / Jana Inman vs Claire Owens / Kenzie Demetros1-6, 0-6
2025-09-07vs We.Bargoil18CLost 01
L#1 DoublesCourtney Britt / Emily Palanzo vs Katie Dickerson / My Linh Lee3-6, 1-6
2025-08-31vs De.Farmer18C5.5Lost 02
L#1 DoublesChristine Waychoff / Emily Palanzo vs Taqiyya Yasin / Latoya Clay3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesHeather Russell / Ellina Max vs Lori Christian / Kristen Gillispie0-6, 2-6
2025-08-17vs Ke.O’Rourke18CWon 10
W#1 DoublesCourtney Britt / Emily Palanzo vs Shannon Grady / Ciara Whipp6-3, 6-1
2025-08-10vs Je.SagalSolomon18CWon 20
W#2 DoublesCourtney Britt / Emily Palanzo vs Jennifer Guy / Christy van Ness6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesEllina Max / Lindsay Bass vs Kelly Kelly / Sharon McCloud6-4, 6-2
2025-08-03vs St.Fogarty18CLost 02
L#1 DoublesChristine Waychoff / Emily Palanzo vs Danielle Cardona / Michelle Metelo3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLindsay Bass / Ellina Max vs Kim Manning / Amanda Brandon4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.62 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.13
Elizabeth Rupert
published
2.99
Katie Warren
published
2.79
Christine Waychoff
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.68
Lisa Dooley
published
2.63
Lindsay Bass
published
2.62
Courtney Britt
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.56
Ellina Max
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.50
2.48
Emily Palanzo
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 2.5
2.41
Lauren Hampton
published
1.99
Jana Inman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lauren Hampton + Emily Palanzo3348% games+8.9% vs expected
Christine Waychoff + Emily Palanzo1643% gamesnot enough data
Katie Warren + Elizabeth Rupert3255% gamesnot enough data
Courtney Britt + Emily Palanzo213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Elizabeth Rupert
23W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%17%83%
3.13
Katie Warren
12W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%53%47%
2.99
3
Christine Waychoff
73W–79L career · 6 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.79
Lisa Dooley
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68
Lindsay Bass
8W–5L career · no lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
2.63
3
Courtney Britt
31W–56L career · 3 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
2.62
3
Ellina Max
59W–61L career · type A · 4 lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
2.56
Nichelle Satterfield
9W–5L career · no lines in 2025
0%50%50%
2.50
2.5
Emily Palanzo
21W–24L career · 6 lines in 2025
0%56%44%
2.48
Lauren Hampton
10W–11L career · no lines in 2025
0%74%26%
2.41
Jana Inman
5W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.99

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.