Teams

Avondale Estates (Courtney Swafford)*

USTA Atlanta Summer - 40 & Over Business Women (Tuesday PM) · 3.0 (3 Lines of Doubles - NO SINGLES)

13 players · average NTRP 2.75 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-07-15vs Bright Water (Betty Ralston)*Lost 03
L#1 DoublesThea Jack / Lisa Jones vs Dawn Kelleher / Betty Ralston4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesPam Ryan / Mette Sorensen vs Kim J King / Regina Walker0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesBeth Jackson-Jordan / Sandra Michaels vs Ubonwan Davis / Nicola Latchman2-6, 0-6
2025-07-11vs Smoke Rise CC (Kelly Leazenbee)*Lost 03
L#1 DoublesLisa Jones / Aimee Chen vs Jess Johnson / Erin Hendrick4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesPam Ryan / Mette Sorensen vs Kelly Leazenbee / Rachele Branson3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesBeth Jackson-Jordan / Helena Feagans vs Beverley Dockeray Ojo / Karen Feagle1-6, 3-2
2025-07-08vs Sugar Creek (D'ablo Hunter)*Lost 03
L#1 DoublesAimee Chen / Lisa Tang vs QuaNeem Saafir / Beverly Terrell1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesThea Jack / Gina Townsend vs Lillian Calhoun / Rosalind Heath2-6, 7-5, 2-6
L#3 DoublesHelena Feagans / Amber Weinberg vs Candace Kearney / Arlene Reese0-6, 0-6
2025-06-24vs McGhee (Melissa Hayes)*Won 21
W#1 DoublesAimee Chen / Lisa Tang vs Melissa Hayes / Rashida Smith7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesNiyati Desai / Lisa Jones vs Angela Adair / Andrea Williams6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesHelena Feagans / Pam Ryan vs Toby Brown - Bolton / Deaitra Palmer0-6, 4-6
2025-06-23vs Rockdale TC (Clarese Williams)*Lost 03
L#1 DoublesNiyati Desai / Gina Townsend vs Shanelle Sims / Karen Tinker0-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLisa Jones / Mette Sorensen vs Latarsha Moss-Littles / Tuyet Mai Nguyen2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAmber Weinberg / Sandra Michaels vs Clarese Williams / Vinique Word3-6, 6-7
2025-06-10vs Bright Water (Betty Ralston)*Lost 12
L#1 DoublesLisa Tang / Sandra Michaels vs Lori Perrone / Dawn Kelleher2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesGina Townsend / Niyati Desai vs Rose Marie Oprysko / Kathy Pittman5-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesCourtney Swafford / Thea Jack vs Donna Downs / Nicola Latchman7-5, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings19 teams · 3.0 (3 Lines of Doubles - NO SINGLES)
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1USTA Atlanta/Julie Holloway60180280
2Olde Atlanta (Amber Baldino)*60171387
3Sugar Creek (D'ablo Hunter)*6013514146
4Smoke Rise CC (Kelly Leazenbee)*4212614153
5Three Chimneys Farm (Nicole Martin)*4212614137
6Vickery (Vanessa Trochmann)*4210817164
7Crooked Creek (Madeline Gmahle)*4210820196
8White Columns (Jenn Linn)*4281024209
9CC of Roswell (Sharon Waymire)*3311718174
10Bright Water (Betty Ralston)*3310819161
11Wild Timber (Keri McCorvey)*3381020164
12Polo Golf & CC (Dee Humphries)*249920177
13Rockdale TC (Clarese Williams)*2481021205
14Rivermoore Park (Ashley Lowenberg)*2471123162
15McGhee (Melissa Hayes)*2481024208
16The Manor (Heela Popal)*1551329209
17Avondale Estates (Courtney Swafford)*1531530212
18Huntington Park (Ginny Velasquez)*0621633234
19Fowler Park (Usharani Sunkara)*0601836216

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.56 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.85
Gina Townsend
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.82
Aimee Chen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.79
Niyati Desai
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.70
Thea Jack
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.59
Pam Ryan
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.56
Lisa Tang
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.54
Courtney Swafford
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.41
Amber Weinberg
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.37
Beth Jackson-Jordan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.37
Mette Sorensen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.36
Sandra Michaels
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.36
Helena Feagans
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Vickie Severcool
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Niyati Desai + Gina Townsend4454% games+3.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Gina Townsend
5W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%87%12%
2.85
3
Aimee Chen
4W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%91%8%
2.82
Niyati Desai
6W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%93%5%
2.79
Thea Jack
1W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
2.70
Pam Ryan
3W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
24%75%<1%
2.59
Lisa Tang
6W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
33%67%<1%
2.56
2.5
Courtney Swafford
3W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
0%38%62%
2.54
3
Amber Weinberg
1W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
75%25%<1%
2.41
2.5
Beth Jackson-Jordan
1W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%84%16%
2.37
Mette Sorensen
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
84%16%<1%
2.37
Sandra Michaels
1W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
85%15%<1%
2.36
2.5
Helena Feagans
2W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%86%14%
2.36
Vickie Severcool
3W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.