Teams

Zhang - Queen of the Court

2025 Howard Tri-Level · Howard Tri-Level 4.5, 4.0, 3.5 Women

16 players · average NTRP 4.00 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule13 played
L#1 DoublesCarol Besse / Pamela Dean vs Buthaina Shukri / Jennifer Mitchell4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMeaghan Williams / Katherine Fluharty vs Nichole Hauswirth / Chrissy Adair4-6, 3-6
W#1 DoublesJulie Lazer / Rachel Martinez vs Jennifer Mitchell / Skeeta Narciss6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesFarzaneh Navid / Jaime Lewis vs Eloise Grose / Jennifer Floyd6-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesNatalie Leveque / Sandy Thongphok vs Nichole Hauswirth / Tricia Muneses2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesHeather Sine / Susan Rhee vs Kathy Crowley / Eloise Grose6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesCintya Leveque / Natalie Leveque vs Cathy Robertson / Jennifer Ivester4-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesCarol Besse / Pamela Dean vs Buthaina Shukri / Jennifer Mitchell1-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDian Zhang / Farzaneh Navid vs Katie Tetrault / Eloise Grose6-0, 3-4
L#1 DoublesRachel Martinez / Julie Lazer vs Eboni Lance / Jennifer Mitchell3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesFarzaneh Navid / Christy Sloan vs Katie Tetrault / Skeeta Narciss4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJennie Kim / Cintya Leveque vs Melissa Lipple / Cathy Robertson5-7, 1-6
W#1 DoublesCarol Besse / Arina Kravitz vs Kelly Dennis / Buthaina Shukri6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesKatherine Fluharty / Julie Edwards vs Jennifer Ivester / Cathy Robertson6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2025-07-01vs Phan - Kicking AcesLost 01
L#2 DoublesJennifer Ivester / Katherine Fluharty vs Desiree Drakakis / Diana Talesnick7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2025-06-26vs Hauswirth - Ball BustersWon 10
W#2 DoublesMeaghan Williams / Katherine Fluharty vs Stephanie Heinrichs / Julie Edwards6-2, 6-2
W#1 DoublesCarol Besse / Pamela Dean vs Kelly Dennis / Buthaina Shukri6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDian Zhang / Farzaneh Navid vs Jennifer Floyd / Kathy Crowley2-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJennie Kim / Julie Edwards vs Tricia Muneses / Jennifer Ivester5-7, 4-6
W#1 DoublesArina Kravitz / Dian Zhang vs Jennifer Mitchell / Buthaina Shukri6-4, 7-5
L#2 DoublesSusan Rhee / Heather Sine vs Jennifer Floyd / Jennifer Exelby6-7, 4-4
L#3 DoublesNatalie Leveque / Cintya Leveque vs Melissa Lipple / Tricia Muneses3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#1 DoublesRachel Martinez / Julie Lazer vs Buthaina Shukri / Kelly Dennis6-3, 6-0
L#2 DoublesDian Zhang / Virginia Fung vs Katie Tetrault / Eloise Grose4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesSandy Thongphok / Katherine Fluharty vs Nichole Hauswirth / Jennifer Ivester3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-05-16vs Phan - Kicking AcesLost 01
L#2 DoublesTricia Muneses / Katherine Fluharty vs Meaghan Curry / Andrea Judd6-4, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Howard Tri-Level 4.5, 4.0, 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.92 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.44
Julie Lazer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.27
Rachel Martinez
published
4.12
Pamela Dean
published
4.11
Arina Kravitz
published 4.5
4.09
Farzaneh Navid
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
4.06
Carol Besse
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.03
Heather Sine
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.93
Dian Zhang
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.92
Katherine Fluharty
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.90
Susan Rhee
published
3.83
Virginia Fung
published
3.79
Jaime Lewis
published 4
3.56
Sandy Thongphok
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.44
Cintya Leveque
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.35
Jennie Kim
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Natalie Leveque
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carol Besse + Pamela Dean5451% games+0.7% vs expected
Natalie Leveque + Cintya Leveque5650% games−4.3% vs expected
Jennie Kim + Cintya Leveque314 matchesnot enough data
Jennie Kim + Sandy Thongphok213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Julie Lazer
29W–30L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
4.44
Rachel Martinez
26W–23L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
4.27
Pamela Dean
40W–40L career · no lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
4.12
4.5
Arina Kravitz
19W–26L career · no lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
4.11
4
Farzaneh Navid
119W–111L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%25%75%
4.09
4.5
Carol Besse
288W–186L career · 4 lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
4.06
4.5
Heather Sine
293W–174L career · 2 lines in 2025
41%59%<1%
4.03
4
Dian Zhang
229W–109L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.93
4
Katherine Fluharty
121W–59L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.92
Susan Rhee
32W–20L career · no lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.90
Virginia Fung
60W–44L career · no lines in 2025
<1%89%10%
3.83
4
Jaime Lewis
7W–10L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%5%
3.79
3.5
Sandy Thongphok
277W–124L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%33%67%
3.56
3.5
Cintya Leveque
299W–233L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
3.44
3.5
Jennie Kim
266W–126L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%87%12%
3.35
3.5
Natalie Leveque
28W–32L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.