Teams

PRC:Rally Cats:Mauro

2026 NCT Tri Level Women · 3.5 Women

4 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings7 teams · 3.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1BTC:Poach Perfect:Griffith000000
2BTC:String Courtette:Walsh/000000
3FV:Lord of the strings:NASSAR000000
4PRC:Rally Cats:Mauro000000
5MRC:TriLevel Northern:Bandak000000
6BSF:Tri Us:Fausey000000
7FV:Game. Set. Chat.:Yaffee/Post Perez000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.45
Suzanne Quaintance
published
3.28
Becky Klimkosky
published 3.5
3.19
Sandra Mauro
published
Sandra Davis
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Suzanne Quaintance
63W–56L career · no lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
3.45
3.5
Becky Klimkosky
50W–25L career · no lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.28
Sandra Mauro
111W–148L career · no lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.19
Sandra Davis
4W–8L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.