Teams

Jones TRI18 3.5/3.0/2.5 Mon

2023 Piedmont Tri-Level 18 & Over · 3.5

7 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.53
Kimberly Franz
published
3.31
Thais Warwar
published
3.28
Melissa Gujrati
published
2.99
Rebekah East
published
2.54
Shelly Penumalli
published
2.48
Stephanie Oudinot
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kimberly Franz
41W–25L career · no lines in 2023
<1%43%57%
3.53
4
Chetana Honnarayanahalli
30W–30L career · type A · no lines in 2023
71%29%<1%
3.42
Thais Warwar
29W–22L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%8%
3.31
Melissa Gujrati
18W–22L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.28
Rebekah East
26W–33L career · no lines in 2023
<1%54%46%
2.99
Shelly Penumalli
19W–14L career · no lines in 2023
38%62%<1%
2.54
Stephanie Oudinot
5W–19L career · no lines in 2023
55%45%<1%
2.48

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.