Teams

J.Collins

2023 Cap Adult 18 & Over · 2.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-05-01vs E.WallaceWon 20
W#1 DoublesKristine Potter / Darcy Louzao vs Ellie Gilmore / Allison Gupton5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesHolly Santago / Laura Valtin vs Kristin Baddour / Jennifer Booth6-1, 6-2
2023-04-24Won 10
W#1 SinglesAshley Grantham vs Meredith Little6-3, 6-3
2023-04-17vs M.CamboWon 21
W#1 DoublesKristine Potter / Darcy Louzao vs Dyvonne Ellis / Cindy Vu6-4, 6-1
L#1 SinglesVickie Gibbs vs Molly Andrews0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesKenie Wrenn / Holly Santago vs Molly Lewis / Lisa Pakela6-0, 4-6, 1-0
2023-04-10Won 10
W#1 SinglesAshley Grantham vs Addison Stallings6-1, 7-5
2023-03-27vs M.DougherWon 20
W#1 DoublesHolly Santago / Darcy Louzao vs Rena Bell / Brooke Harris6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKristine Potter / Susie Albion vs Elizabeth Fogleman / Amy Whitaker6-0, 6-2
2023-03-20vs B.ShaitLost 01
L#1 DoublesSusie Albion / Ashley Grantham vs Beth Gildea / Courtney Phillips2-6, 2-6
2023-03-13vs R.WatkinsWon 20
W#1 DoublesKristine Potter / Holly Santago vs Julia Stevens / Allie Hammond6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesVickie Gibbs vs Ciara Whipp6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.67 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Holly Santago
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.34
Kristine Potter
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
2.79
Anne Redmond
published 3
2.69
Joanna Valler
published
2.60
Susie Albion
published
2.56
Laura Valtin
published
2.49
Ashley Grantham
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.35
Vickie Gibbs
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 2.5
2.25
Darcy Louzao
published 2.5
2.25
Lusally Hong
published
Joshua Collins
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristine Potter + Holly Santago21469% games+1.3% vs expected
Vickie Gibbs + Ashley Grantham1445% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Holly Santago
127W–36L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
3.40
3.5
Kristine Potter
146W–70L career · 8 lines in 2023
<1%88%11%
3.34
3
Anne Redmond
18W–26L career · no lines in 2023
1%94%5%
2.79
Joanna Valler
3W–2L career · no lines in 2023
7%92%1%
2.69
Susie Albion
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
2.60
Laura Valtin
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
>99%<1%<1%
2.56
3
Ashley Grantham
36W–53L career · 3 lines in 2023
52%48%<1%
2.49
2.5
Vickie Gibbs
55W–75L career · 2 lines in 2023
0%88%12%
2.35
2.5
Darcy Louzao
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
0%97%3%
2.25
Lusally Hong
3W–3L career · no lines in 2023
0%98%2%
2.25
Joshua Collins
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.