Teams

Seven Meadows

Adult 18 & Over 2.5M - 5.0+ Men's Thursday · Men 5.0

9 players · average NTRP 4.83 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-06-25vs LLTC -ButlerLost 12
L#1 DoublesAndrew Zhang / Jimmy Zhang vs Jose Antelo / Frederick Albion6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesWilly Lock vs Christopher Sioco6-6
L#2 DoublesGuillermo Cosson / Javier Bacaicoa vs John Butler / Milos Kustudija4-4
2026-06-11vs LLTC -ButlerLost 02
L#1 DoublesJimmy Zhang / Andrew Zhang vs Jose Antelo / Frederick Albion6-1, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesAndrey Tsekhovych vs Christopher Sioco1-6, 2-6
2026-06-04vs LLTC - LelandWon 30
W#1 DoublesGonzalo Anderson / Guillermo Cosson vs Aidan Dominguez / Randal Lemmon6-2, 6-4
W#1 SinglesAndrey Tsekhovych vs Thaddeus Holloway6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesWilly Lock / Javier Bacaicoa vs Neil Carpenter / Mihir Nadig6-2, 6-3
2026-04-30vs LLTC -ButlerSplit 11
W#1 DoublesGuillermo Cosson / Jonathas Sucupira vs Nicholas Butler / Ross Gehlhausen2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJavier Bacaicoa / Willy Lock vs Jose Antelo / Frederick Albion4-6, 4-6
2026-04-23vs LLTC - LelandWon 20
W#1 DoublesWilly Lock / Andrey Tsekhovych vs Aidan Dominguez / Randal Lemmon7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJavier Bacaicoa / Andrew Zhang vs Fernando Arguello / Neil Carpenter7-6, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · Men 5.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LLTC -Butler5114412122
2Seven Meadows329614118
3LLTC - Leland0511428177

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.60 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.77
Guillermo Cosson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.70
Javier Bacaicoa
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.65
Jonathas Sucupira
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.62
Andrey Tsekhovych
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 5
4.54
Jimmy Zhang
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
4.35
Andrew Zhang
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 5
Corey Kruseman
published 4.5
Gonzalo Anderson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Willy Lock
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Guillermo Cosson
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.77
Javier Bacaicoa
2W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.70
Jonathas Sucupira
2W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
no projection at this level
4.65
5
Andrey Tsekhovych
2W–1L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.62
Jimmy Zhang
9W–3L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%38%62%
4.54
5
Andrew Zhang
9W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.35
4.5
Corey Kruseman
6W–7L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Gonzalo Anderson
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Willy Lock
3W–1L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.