Teams

1. November

NO LEAGUE · REFUND HOLDING AREA

10 players · average NTRP 3.57 / WASHINGTON D.C.

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings15 teams · REFUND HOLDING AREA
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
11 January000000
21 February000000
31 March000000
41. April000000
51. May000000
61.June000000
72.June000000
81. July000000
92.July000000
103.July000000
111. August000000
121. September000000
131. October000000
141. November000000
151. December000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.95
Justin Dorsk
published 4.5
3.74
Kay Bransford
published 4
3.60
3.34
Elisa Wolf
published 3.5
2.94
Rachele Stines
published 3
2.90
Denese Cavanaugh
published 3
2.80
Donna Jones
published
Chelbe Williams
published 3
Rachael Smith
published
Verna Flemming
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rachele Stines + Denese Cavanaugh123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Justin Dorsk
126W–83L career · no lines in 2023
65%35%<1%
3.95
4
Kay Bransford
304W–204L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%3%
3.74
4
Julian Myers Benton
87W–85L career · no lines in 2023
25%75%<1%
3.60
3.5
Elisa Wolf
177W–86L career · no lines in 2023
1%86%13%
3.34
3
Rachele Stines
165W–138L career · no lines in 2023
<1%66%34%
2.94
3
Denese Cavanaugh
147W–104L career · no lines in 2023
<1%76%24%
2.90
Donna Jones
21W–21L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
2.80
3
Chelbe Williams
44W–34L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Rachael Smith
0W–9L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Verna Flemming
7W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.