Teams

Salt Lake Tennis-Williams

2025 Winter League-Saturday · 2.5W Saturday

12 players · average NTRP 2.79 / UTAH

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
W#1 DoublesCandace Haroldsen / Paige Smathers vs Stacy Harbertson / Shelby Hales6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesStaci Dansie / Mckenna Kimball vs Adri Soffe / Ashley Theodore6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesMegan Pierce / Rayna Lofgren vs Kimberly Chytraus / Angela Fletcher6-2, 2-4, 0-1
2025-03-08vs Liberty Park Tennis-En FuegoLost 12
W#1 DoublesCandace Haroldsen / Paige Smathers vs Trena Anderson / Blake Bohe6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesKristin Midyett / Lisa Sehy vs Alicia Miller / Ann Monroy6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMegan Pierce / Sabrina Vienneau vs Shelly Kaihatu / Janelle Freund6-7, 1-5
2025-03-01vs Cottonwood Club-Special KWon 21
W#1 DoublesPat Williams / Mari Bickmore vs Kristin Rocke / Kristine Johnson6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesCarissa Monroy / Lisa Sehy vs Lisa Harrison / Lindsay Sparks6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesRayna Lofgren / Sabrina Vienneau vs Emily Miska / Elise Matthews4-6, 3-4
2025-02-22vs Sports Mall-Team FunWon 21
L#1 DoublesMckenna Kimball / Pat Williams vs Jenna DeLong / Lindsay Roth4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesPaige Smathers / Carissa Monroy vs Olivia Moreton / Karen Weyman6-4, 2-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesYue Liu / Lisa Sehy vs Ann Chenoweth / Rebecca Rynders6-2, 6-1
2025-02-08vs Liberty Park Tennis-Chytraus/WeeksLost 12
L#1 DoublesStaci Dansie / Mari Bickmore vs Christina Montero / Cristina Cook6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCandace Haroldsen / Paige Smathers vs Kimberly Chytraus / Heather Wissler6-0, 6-0
L#3 DoublesCarissa Monroy / Yue Liu vs Adri Soffe / Tiffany Rodriguez6-3, 2-5, 0-1
2025-01-25vs Liberty Park Tennis-En FuegoLost 12
L#1 DoublesKristin Midyett / Staci Dansie vs Jenna Pike / Lacey Johnson6-0, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesRayna Lofgren / Sabrina Vienneau vs Ann Monroy / Maddison Weber4-6, 1-5
W#3 DoublesMckenna Kimball / Yue Liu vs Debbie Beckstrom / Teresa Hatter5-0, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 2.5W Saturday
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Liberty Park Tennis-En Fuego5212921182
2Liberty Park Tennis-Chytraus/Weeks5212924178
3Salt Lake Tennis-Williams339919124

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.51 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.29
Paige Smathers
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.99
Candace Haroldsen
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.83
Mckenna Kimball
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.61
Megan Pierce
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.49
Staci Dansie
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.42
Pat Williams
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.32
Mari Bickmore
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.30
Carissa Monroy
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.25
Rayna Lofgren
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Lisa Sehy
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.08
Kristin Midyett
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.00
Sabrina Vienneau
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Paige Smathers + Candace Haroldsen13175% games+21.2% vs expected
Mckenna Kimball + Megan Pierce12364% games+17.0% vs expected
Mari Bickmore + Megan Pierce2347% games+7.0% vs expected
Mari Bickmore + Staci Dansie51144% games+2.5% vs expected
Kristin Midyett + Staci Dansie1844% games+0.9% vs expected
Kristin Midyett + Carissa Monroy1736% games−1.2% vs expected
Sabrina Vienneau + Rayna Lofgren2836% games−9.7% vs expected
Candace Haroldsen + Kristin Midyett314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Paige Smathers
40W–11L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.29
3
Candace Haroldsen
86W–59L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%53%47%
2.99
3
Mckenna Kimball
27W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.83
Megan Pierce
22W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
2.61
3
Staci Dansie
50W–155L career · 3 lines in 2025
53%47%<1%
2.49
Pat Williams
20W–31L career · 5 lines in 2025
72%28%<1%
2.42
3
Mari Bickmore
87W–239L career · type A · 2 lines in 2025
92%8%<1%
2.32
2.5
Carissa Monroy
19W–31L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%93%7%
2.30
Rayna Lofgren
9W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%97%3%
2.25
2.5
Lisa Sehy
2W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Kristin Midyett
41W–130L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.08
Sabrina Vienneau
5W–30L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.00

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.