Teams

Soffe 300

2025 USTA Adult 55 & Over · 9.0M

8 players · average NTRP 4.33 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-08-03vs Wasatch Hills-KesterWon 10
W#1 DoublesKC Agrelius / Stephen Thompson vs Patrick Sheehan / Norm Kester5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2025-08-02vs Utah/Duncan/55&O/9.0MLost 02
L#1 DoublesKC Agrelius / Steven Black vs Chad Duncan / Paul Jones6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesRobert Scranton / Ryan Nelson vs Jon Penman / Michael Malin1-6, 1-6
2025-08-02vs Schoenbaum/AlbertLost 02
L#1 DoublesRyan Nelson / Robert Scranton vs Paul Dunford / Ron Schoenbaum1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKC Agrelius / Steven Hutchinson vs Steve Albert / Karl Ward0-6, 1-6
2025-08-01vs Wasatch Hills-KesterSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKC Agrelius / David Pack vs Jason Petersen / JJ Harrison6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRobert Scranton / Stephen Thompson vs John Collins / David Hopkins1-6, 6-1, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 9.0M
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Utah/Duncan/55&O/9.0M4093992
2Schoenbaum/Albert135715120
3Soffe 300043920124

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.90 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.25
KC Agrelius
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.16
David Pack
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.89
Stephen Thompson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published
3.69
Gretchen Soffe
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.51
Robert Scranton
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Steven Black
usually #3 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Steven Hutchinson
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
William Roeca
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stephen Thompson + Steven Black303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
KC Agrelius
8W–28L career · 4 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
4.25
4.5
David Pack
10W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
13%86%1%
4.16
Stephen Thompson
62W–21L career · 10 lines in 2025
<1%77%22%
3.89
4
Gretchen Soffe
79W–60L career · 3 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.69
Robert Scranton
28W–36L career · 3 lines in 2025
48%52%<1%
3.51
Steven Black
37W–41L career · 9 lines in 2025
not enough data
Steven Hutchinson
5W–15L career · 8 lines in 2025
not enough data
William Roeca
29W–40L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.