Teams

DHertzog-HVCC

2026 Eno River Combo 55 & Over · 55 & Over Combo 6.5 Women Eve

15 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 upcoming · 2 played
Sep 7 6:30 PM
Hope Valley Country Club
Sep 21 6:30 PM
Hope Valley Country Club
Sep 28 6:30 PM
Rock Quarry Tennis Courts
2026-08-31vs DLiller.C-HSLost 12
L#1 DoublesBarbara Wilhelm / Jennifer Pyle vs Sheza Healey / Donna Spero3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesStephanie Perun / Ruth Caccavale vs Tracy Stefan / Laura Webb-Murrah2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDeborah Hertzog / Nancy Pike vs Sally Mauriello / Jennifer Hoffmann4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2026-08-10vs DLiller.C-HSWon 21
L#1 DoublesBarbara Wilhelm / Elisabeth Wiener vs Jennifer Hoffmann / Sally Mauriello3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJennifer Pyle / Deborah Hertzog vs Altagracia Evert / Pat Rowe7-6, 6-2
W#3 DoublesCecily Peterson / Elizabeth Yancy vs Dori Liller / Millie Hunter6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & Over Combo 6.5 Women Eve have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.95 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.16
Jennifer Pyle
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.14
Joan Mueller
published
3.13
Barbara Wilhelm
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.09
Nancy Pike
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.09
Ruth Caccavale
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.08
Elisabeth Wiener
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.05
Cecily Peterson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.03
Deborah Hertzog
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
3.03
Thekla Pappas
published
2.96
Joanie Preyer
published
2.84
Stephanie Perun
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.78
Mary Grigg
published
2.72
Elizabeth Yancy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.66
Elizabeth Everett
published
2.46
Susan Peak
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Deborah Hertzog + Barbara Wilhelm5355% games−8.3% vs expected
Mary Grigg + Elizabeth Everett134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Pyle
10W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
3.16
Joan Mueller
2W–1L career · no lines in 2026
15%84%1%
3.14
3
Barbara Wilhelm
47W–30L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%17%83%
3.13
Nancy Pike
9W–16L career · 1 line in 2026
25%74%<1%
3.09
Ruth Caccavale
4W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
25%74%<1%
3.09
Elisabeth Wiener
2W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
28%71%<1%
3.08
3
Cecily Peterson
207W–207L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%36%64%
3.05
3
Deborah Hertzog
24W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%42%58%
3.03
Thekla Pappas
2W–5L career · no lines in 2026
43%57%<1%
3.03
Joanie Preyer
12W–12L career · no lines in 2026
<1%63%37%
2.96
3
Stephanie Perun
34W–67L career · 1 line in 2026
1%87%12%
2.84
Mary Grigg
4W–8L career · no lines in 2026
2%92%5%
2.78
Elizabeth Yancy
2W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
6%92%2%
2.72
Elizabeth Everett
8W–20L career · no lines in 2026
13%86%1%
2.66
Susan Peak
2W–6L career · no lines in 2026
60%40%<1%
2.46

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.