Teams

Queen City

2024 OH OV SUMMER A18&O Cincinnati · 2024 Summer A 18&O 4.5W Cincinnati

16 players · average NTRP 4.00 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-07-24vs EasternLost 12
L#1 DoublesChrissy Buckingham / Heather Tash vs Jennifer Allman / Emily Thurman5-7, 0-6
W#2 DoublesLynda Baumann / Wendy Weil vs Kelly Patterson / Julie Stephenson6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesBethe Orlando / Merri Beth Hebeler vs Tricia Headley / Kathy Kelly4-6, 3-6
2024-07-10vs BeechmontLost 02
L#2 DoublesMichelle Koehlke / Maggie Minich vs Sarika Reddy Sunki / Gillian Oakenfull1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesBethe Orlando / Felicia Bourbon vs Kelly Allen / Kelly Cox-Donson0-6, 4-6
2024-06-26vs EasternWon 21
W#1 DoublesMadison Bourbon / Chrissy Buckingham vs Meta Stoll / Amy Cooper6-4, 7-6
L#2 DoublesLynda Baumann / Merri Beth Hebeler vs Perin Goodman / Jennifer Allman7-5, 0-6, 4-5
W#2 SinglesJessica Spry vs Kelly Patterson5-7, 6-1, 1-0
2024-06-12vs BeechmontLost 04
L#1 DoublesBeth King / Chrissy Buckingham vs Kelly Cox-Donson / Meaghan Colville2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLynda Baumann / Michelle Koehlke vs Gillian Oakenfull / Anna Albi3-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesJessica Spry vs Simone Nixon1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesWendy Weil / Maureen Ernst vs Beth Kushon / Sarika Reddy Sunki3-6, 3-6
2024-06-05vs EasternLost 02
L#2 DoublesWendy Weil / Maggie Minich vs Kelly Patterson / Shannon Zak3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesBeth King / Merri Beth Hebeler vs Meg Townsend-Washenberger / Mary Herrington6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2024-05-22vs BeechmontLost 05
L#1 DoublesLynda Baumann / Amy Ellis vs Anna Albi / Angela Wilson0-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesJessica Spry vs Katie Kase1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesBethe Orlando / Michelle Koehlke vs Kristen Baldini / Nicole Ehme1-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesWendy Weil vs Shae Kimbell1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJeanne Miller / Felicia Bourbon vs Kelly Cox-Donson / Sarika Reddy Sunki1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 2024 Summer A 18&O 4.5W Cincinnati
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Beechmont602824138
2Queen City2492145314
3Eastern1582248333

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.76 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.98
Jessica Spry
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.89
MacKenzie Hammel
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.87
Maggie Minich
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.83
Chrissy Buckingham
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.81
Lynda Baumann
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.77
Maureen Ernst
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Amy Ellis
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
Beth King
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.72
Bethe Orlando
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.62
Felicia Bourbon
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.60
Heather Tash
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.53
Merri Beth Hebeler
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Jeanne Miller
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
Madison Bourbon
published
Michelle Koehlke
published
Wendy Weil
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Felicia Bourbon + Maureen Ernst5065% games+15.3% vs expected
Felicia Bourbon + Merri Beth Hebeler10551% games+4.2% vs expected
Jeanne Miller + Felicia Bourbon7454% gamesnot enough data
Lynda Baumann + Michelle Koehlke2537% gamesnot enough data
Wendy Weil + Lynda Baumann1537% gamesnot enough data
Felicia Bourbon + Bethe Orlando3255% gamesnot enough data
Jeanne Miller + Wendy Weil044 matchesnot enough data
Jeanne Miller + Lynda Baumann314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jessica Spry
7W–9L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%55%45%
3.98
MacKenzie Hammel
18W–10L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
3.89
Maggie Minich
29W–23L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
3.87
4
Chrissy Buckingham
18W–14L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%88%11%
3.83
Lynda Baumann
17W–43L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%90%8%
3.81
Maureen Ernst
29W–17L career · 5 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Amy Ellis
19W–19L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Beth King
4W–17L career · type A · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Bethe Orlando
24W–19L career · 3 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.72
Felicia Bourbon
60W–50L career · 2 lines in 2024
20%79%<1%
3.62
Heather Tash
35W–23L career · 6 lines in 2024
25%75%<1%
3.60
Merri Beth Hebeler
42W–38L career · 3 lines in 2024
42%58%<1%
3.53
Jeanne Miller
34W–29L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data
Madison Bourbon
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Michelle Koehlke
4W–15L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Wendy Weil
8W–43L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.