Teams

HMTC

2022 CTA TWILIGHT - NOCO · WOMEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT - NOCO

8 players · average NTRP 3.38 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-09-11vs MLFLost 02
L#1 DoublesCimarron Spitz / Wendy Ball vs Andrea Flake / Camy Davis3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesGina Zachman vs Megan Mattix6-3, 0-6, 0-1
2022-08-29vs LVTA PURPLELost 02
L#1 DoublesTeresa Adsit / Wendy Ball vs Heidi Abrahamson / Heather Huntley2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJill Braddock / Cimarron Spitz vs Hilary Gaylord / Ashley Kasprzak3-6, 0-6
2022-08-22vs FCCC PINKSplit 11
L#1 SinglesGina Zachman vs Nancy Kepner0-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesWendy Ball / Teresa Adsit vs Kristine Clagett / Catherine Orr6-2, 6-3
2022-08-15vs CSU GOLDLost 02
L#1 SinglesGina Zachman vs Leticia Dunn3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCimarron Spitz / Wendy Ball vs Camille Benton / Barbara Balok2-6, 7-6, 0-1
2022-08-01vs MLFLost 01
L#2 DoublesStacey Fox / Teresa Adsit vs Samantha Gallegos / Morgan Gordon2-6, 2-6
2022-07-25vs LVTA PURPLELost 02
L#1 DoublesCimarron Spitz / Stacey Fox vs Meredith Lorick / Karen Pielin5-7, 1-6
L#1 SinglesGina Zachman vs Josephine Bikos2-6, 6-2, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT - NOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.03 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.24
Angela Brown
published 3.5
3.21
Stacey Fox
published
3.04
Cimarron Spitz
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.04
Gina Zachman
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
2.91
Teresa Adsit
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.73
Wendy Ball
published
Jill Braddock
published
Jodi Koronich
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Teresa Adsit + Cimarron Spitz91743% games−4.5% vs expected
Wendy Ball + Stacey Fox1428% gamesnot enough data
Teresa Adsit + Gina Zachman314 matchesnot enough data
Cimarron Spitz + Jodi Koronich213 matchesnot enough data
Jodi Koronich + Jill Braddock123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Angela Brown
27W–35L career · type A · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.24
Stacey Fox
28W–19L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Cimarron Spitz
50W–115L career · type A · 4 lines in 2022
38%62%<1%
3.04
3.5
Gina Zachman
23W–78L career · type A · 4 lines in 2022
38%62%<1%
3.04
3
Teresa Adsit
81W–108L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%76%23%
2.91
Wendy Ball
13W–38L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
2.73
Jill Braddock
7W–27L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Jodi Koronich
10W–10L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.