Teams

LEBTC ORANGE

2023 CTA WOMEN'S SUMMER DAYTIME - DEN · WOMEN 2.5 - SUMMER DAYTIME

7 players · average NTRP 2.62 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-08-08vs LEBTC BLUEWon 20
W#1 DoublesLaurie Sinclair / Kim Kronenberger Hogan vs Suzanne Termaat / Deborah Cartwright7-5, 6-4
W#2 DoublesStephanie Auth / Lindsay Harrell vs LuAnn Wadman / Keary Hallack6-3, 1-6, 1-0
2023-08-01vs CK GOLDSplit 11
W#1 DoublesLaurie Sinclair / Lindsay Harrell vs Tamara Yount / Laura FitzSimmons6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesHeather Hooper / Sarah Veitenhaus vs Andrea Shearer / Sarah Franzen2-6, 6-7
2023-07-25vs NJ TEALLost 01
L#1 DoublesStephanie Auth / Laurie Sinclair vs Ingrid Palmer / Deena Green5-7, 4-6
2023-07-24vs RHCC REDWon 10
W#1 DoublesStephanie Auth / Laurie Sinclair vs Tiffany Skiles / Jo DeLisa3-1
2023-07-18vs CCC GREENSplit 11
L#1 DoublesHeather Hooper / Laurie Sinclair vs Terri Slekes / Ashley Esposito1-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesStephanie Auth / Sarah Veitenhaus vs Jailyn Volok / Amanda Bassett6-2, 6-4
2023-07-11vs KC-RH YELLOWWon 10
W#1 DoublesStephanie Auth / Laurie Sinclair vs Amy Green / Donata Reeser6-2, 6-2
2023-06-27vs LPTC REDLost 01
L#1 DoublesSarah Veitenhaus / Stephanie Auth vs Tina Atchley / Leigh Goerke1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 2.5 - SUMMER DAYTIME have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.49 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.75
Lindsay Harrell
published
2.66
Renee Krause
published
2.49
Sarah Veitenhaus
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.49
Kim Kronenberger Hogan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.37
Stephanie Auth
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.20
Laurie Sinclair
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Megan Fry
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stephanie Auth + Sarah Veitenhaus21760% games+4.7% vs expected
Kim Kronenberger Hogan + Laurie Sinclair9955% games−6.0% vs expected
Stephanie Auth + Laurie Sinclair6257% gamesnot enough data
Stephanie Auth + Kim Kronenberger Hogan4355% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lindsay Harrell
21W–20L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%4%
2.75
Renee Krause
2W–6L career · no lines in 2023
13%87%1%
2.66
2.5
Sarah Veitenhaus
57W–46L career · 3 lines in 2023
0%52%48%
2.49
3
Kim Kronenberger Hogan
38W–53L career · 1 line in 2023
53%47%<1%
2.49
2.5
Stephanie Auth
92W–79L career · 6 lines in 2023
0%82%18%
2.37
2.5
Laurie Sinclair
70W–61L career · 6 lines in 2023
0%98%2%
2.20
Megan Fry
9W–19L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.