Teams

BP/Dean/Bishop

2023 COTA USTA Tri-level 18 & Over Women - Spring · 2.5, 3.0, 3.5 Flight I

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 2.5, 3.0, 3.5 Flight I have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.73 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.20
Julie Spivey
published
2.93
Angela Dean
published 3
2.84
Jane Argo
published
Gillian Ball
published 3
Irina Rozovsky
published 3
2.72
Dana Buxton
published 3
2.68
Breanne Benton
published 3
2.64
Alison Godley
published 3
2.60
Emily Davenport
published 3
2.51
Maura Beyer
published
2.48
Sandrine Zawacki
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gillian Ball + Angela Dean213 matchesnot enough data
Breanne Benton + Maura Beyer213 matchesnot enough data
Irina Rozovsky + Maura Beyer123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Julie Spivey
45W–33L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.20
3
Angela Dean
41W–26L career · no lines in 2023
<1%71%28%
2.93
Jane Argo
5W–25L career · no lines in 2023
89%11%<1%
2.84
3
Gillian Ball
8W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Irina Rozovsky
9W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Dana Buxton
14W–10L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
2.72
3
Breanne Benton
19W–20L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%1%
2.68
3
Alison Godley
9W–14L career · no lines in 2023
15%85%<1%
2.64
3
Emily Davenport
13W–20L career · no lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
2.60
Maura Beyer
17W–21L career · no lines in 2023
46%54%<1%
2.51
Sandrine Zawacki
8W–26L career · no lines in 2023
56%44%<1%
2.48

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.