Teams

Team 3 Dare Doubles

2022 NOVA Combo Mixed · NOVA Combo Mixed 6.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.40 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-11-11vs Team 2Won 20
W#1 DoublesYong Jae Lee / Colleen Peacher vs ERIC Levine / Stephanie Peebles6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesChandler Fox / Leslie-Anne Levy vs David Taylor / Elizabeth Font7-6, 6-2
2022-10-25vs Team 4 Pains in the AceWon 10
W#3 DoublesJoanne Swain / Robert Evans vs Wayne Chopus / Caroline Chopus6-7, 4-2
2022-10-16vs Team 1 High RollersLost 01
L#2 DoublesColleen Peacher / Matthew Day vs Alan Zhang / Yuan Zhang1-6, 2-6
2022-09-20vs Team 4 Pains in the AceWon 10
W#2 DoublesLeslie-Anne Levy / Chandler Fox vs Andrea Henningsen / Jack Barufka5-7, 6-1, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Combo Mixed 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Leslie-Anne Levy
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.49
Nancy Rowland
published
3.45
Alissa Forbes
published 3.5
3.35
Samuel Ryan
published
3.34
Colleen Peacher
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.01
Thomas McCrary
published
2.88
Stephanie Wright
published
2.85
Joanne Swain
published
2.78
Chandler Fox
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.73
Robert Evans
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Yong Jae Lee
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Samuel Ryan + Alissa Forbes2348% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Leslie-Anne Levy
117W–90L career · 2 lines in 2022
2%94%5%
3.78
Nancy Rowland
1W–5L career · no lines in 2022
52%48%<1%
3.49
3.5
Alissa Forbes
92W–46L career · no lines in 2022
<1%66%34%
3.45
Samuel Ryan
13W–12L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
3.35
3.5
Colleen Peacher
119W–124L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%88%11%
3.34
Thomas McCrary
43W–39L career · no lines in 2022
<1%47%53%
3.01
Stephanie Wright
1W–10L career · no lines in 2022
82%18%<1%
2.88
Joanne Swain
2W–7L career · no lines in 2022
88%12%<1%
2.85
3
Chandler Fox
63W–59L career · 2 lines in 2022
2%94%5%
2.78
3
Robert Evans
30W–53L career · type M · 1 line in 2022
4%94%2%
2.73
Nazarina Phommachanh
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Yong Jae Lee
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.