Teams

LHabib-DUR

2026 Eno River Singles 18 & Over · 18 & Over Singles 4.5 Women Evening

7 players · average NTRP 4.08 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-07-18vs GSmith-HRLost 03
L#1 SinglesSapna Varkey vs Jennifer Moore2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 SinglesZoe Dubrow vs Katie Neal4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 SinglesHannah Silverstein vs Amy Beth Kessinger1-6, 1-6
2026-07-14vs APlachco-DURLost 03
L#1 SinglesTiffany Langino vs Kim El6-7, 6-7
L#2 SinglesHannah Silverstein vs Emily Callahan2-6, 5-7
L#3 SinglesBetsy Shane vs Ana Plachco0-6, 4-6
2026-06-17vs JRoss-DURLost 12
L#1 SinglesZoe Dubrow vs Amanda Linke3-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesSapna Varkey vs Anna Hodges2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 SinglesTiffany Langino vs Chace Ogle0-6, 3-6
2026-06-10vs AHoots-TOCHWon 21
L#1 SinglesTiffany Langino vs Madeline Finley2-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesLina Habib vs Elizabeth McNamara5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 SinglesHannah Silverstein vs Kyrsten Le7-5, 6-1
2026-06-03vs APlachco-DURLost 03
L#1 SinglesKatya Lundberg vs Cheryl Reid3-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesLina Habib vs Emily Callahan4-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesBetsy Shane vs Katherine Leib0-6, 0-6
2026-05-20vs GSmith-HRLost 03
L#1 SinglesZoe Dubrow vs Leslie Boesch3-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesHannah Silverstein vs Chunyan Xie3-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesBetsy Shane vs Geraldine Smith0-6, 0-6
2026-05-13vs AHoots-TOCHWon 21
W#1 SinglesTiffany Langino vs Lynne Davis6-3, 6-4
W#2 SinglesKatya Lundberg vs Kyrsten Le6-4, 6-2
L#3 SinglesBetsy Shane vs Jenny Perry1-6, 2-6
2026-05-06vs JRoss-DURLost 03
L#1 SinglesSapna Varkey vs Amanda Linke3-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesLina Habib vs Valerie Acre5-7, 0-6
L#3 SinglesKatya Lundberg vs Justyne Ross4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 18 & Over Singles 4.5 Women Evening
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GSmith-HR802228123
2APlachco-DUR44131126218
3AHoots-TOCH2681632231
4LHabib-DUR2651940266

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.83 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.21
Zoe Dubrow
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4.5
4.04
Sapna Varkey
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4
3.83
Tiffany Langino
usually #3 Singles 43%, also #1 Singles 43% · published 4
3.80
Lina Habib
usually #2 Singles 86%, also #3 Singles 14% · published 4
3.76
Katya Lundberg
usually #1 Singles 43%, also #3 Singles 43% · published
3.70
Hannah Silverstein
usually #2 Singles 44%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 4
3.47
Betsy Shane
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 4
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Zoe Dubrow
101W–75L career · 3 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
4.21
4
Sapna Varkey
81W–29L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%37%63%
4.04
4
Tiffany Langino
244W–125L career · 7 lines in 2026
1%88%12%
3.83
4
Lina Habib
38W–41L career · 7 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
3.80
Katya Lundberg
5W–8L career · 7 lines in 2026
3%92%4%
3.76
4
Hannah Silverstein
67W–104L career · 9 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
3.70
4
Betsy Shane
0W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
59%41%<1%
3.47

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.