Teams

Weber - Wise Aces-Woodlands Parks

*2025 Adult Combo 6.5- 9.5 NoHo Women · 7.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-09-17vs Zanders-Dream Team-Woodlands ParksLost 03
L#1 DoublesErika Breen / Rachel Polsky vs Lindsay Dornier / Mae Melicor4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCammy Crawford / Brionna Mayr vs Betsy Lyman / Stephanie Greaves1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesTina Weber / Line Kristensen Coleman vs Amanda Nunes / Karla Medrano3-6, 3-6
2025-09-10vs Lees-Casual Sets-KCCWon 30
W#1 DoublesCarol Williams / Season Flannery vs Darcie Schlegel / Michelle Purdy6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTina Weber / Nayi Leger vs Stacey Emmons / Lorrie Marder6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMary Lou Suss / Erika Breen vs Ruxandra Buzoeanu / Riane Stanley6-2, 6-1
W#1 DoublesCammy Crawford / Rachel Polsky vs Valeria Vizcardo / Kristen Maxwell6-3, 7-6
W#2 DoublesShana Dillon / Nayi Leger vs Maria del Pilar Marin / Eleonora Tonti2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBrionna Mayr / Kaley Majeski vs Maria Carmona / Kristen DeLange6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2025-08-27vs Vogel-Volley Girls-BentwaterWon 21
W#1 DoublesTina Weber / Line Kristensen Coleman vs Monique Whyte / Dana Saunders2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMary Lou Suss / Shana Dillon vs Bridget Seals / Suzanne Dupre6-3, 6-0
L#3 DoublesCarol Williams / Season Flannery vs Deanne Mittlesteadt / Martha Vogel2-6, 4-6
2025-08-13vs Zanders-Dream Team-Woodlands ParksLost 12
W#1 DoublesKaley Majeski / Erika Breen vs Rachel Wilson / Libia T Duarte Forero3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBrionna Mayr / Line Kristensen Coleman vs Stephanie Greaves / Karla Medrano6-7, 5-7
L#3 DoublesSeason Flannery / Nayi Leger vs Amanda Nunes / Thuy T Nguyen2-6, 3-6
2025-08-06vs Lees-Casual Sets-KCCWon 30
W#1 DoublesCammy Crawford / Kaley Majeski vs Michelle Purdy / Riane Stanley6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesMary Lou Suss / Shana Dillon vs Jill Stofa / Stacey Emmons6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesRachel Polsky / Erika Breen vs Ruxandra Buzoeanu / Darcie Schlegel6-4, 6-2
W#1 DoublesCammy Crawford / Kaley Majeski vs PAIGE PHUONG / Marianela Ramirez6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesTina Weber / Carol Williams vs Lori VanJoslin / Valeria Vizcardo3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesShana Dillon / Mary Lou Suss vs Maria Carmona / Mutsumi Gonzalez3-6, 4-6
2025-07-23vs Vogel-Volley Girls-BentwaterWon 21
L#1 DoublesKaley Majeski / Carol Williams vs Deanne Mittlesteadt / Martha Vogel6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMary Lou Suss / Brionna Mayr vs Christina Flowers / Suzanne Dupre7-6, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCammy Crawford / Season Flannery vs Viktoria Mategrano / Brenda Palamar6-0, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.47 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Kaley Majeski
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.71
Mary Lou Suss
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.64
Line Kristensen Coleman
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.54
Cammy Crawford
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.46
Erika Breen
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.37
Season Flannery
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.33
Tina Weber
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.31
Rachel Polsky
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.29
Brionna Mayr
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.26
Shana Dillon
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Nayi Leger
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rachel Polsky + Brionna Mayr4255% games+14.0% vs expected
Season Flannery + Brionna Mayr2344% games−3.1% vs expected
Rachel Polsky + Erika Breen1442% gamesnot enough data
Shana Dillon + Brionna Mayr3259% gamesnot enough data
Kaley Majeski + Cammy Crawford4162% gamesnot enough data
Tina Weber + Line Kristensen Coleman213 matchesnot enough data
Rachel Polsky + Shana Dillon213 matchesnot enough data
Shana Dillon + Mary Lou Suss213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kaley Majeski
30W–7L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%1%99%
3.79
Mary Lou Suss
35W–46L career · 5 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.71
Line Kristensen Coleman
3W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
14%86%<1%
3.64
3.5
Cammy Crawford
22W–12L career · type A · 5 lines in 2025
<1%37%63%
3.54
3.5
Erika Breen
17W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
3.46
Season Flannery
13W–15L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%84%16%
3.37
Tina Weber
19W–32L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%90%10%
3.33
Rachel Polsky
19W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%92%8%
3.31
3.5
Brionna Mayr
19W–14L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%93%5%
3.29
Shana Dillon
22W–11L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%94%3%
3.26
Nayi Leger
12W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.