← Teams

WHRC-Murdoch/Mehta

2019 Mixed 40 & Over · 8.0 Mixed

9 players · average NTRP 3.83 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.49 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

—
Bruce Sylva
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.25
Michael Yee
usually #3 Doubles 42%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.84
Claire Thayer
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.75
Sally Murdoch
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.64
Marc DeSantis
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.40
Jack Carlson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.26
Neville Mehta
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.03
Jana Hirst
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.76
Randolph Splitter
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Results9 ties
2019-03-10Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesShannon Berry / Michael Yee vs Deb Garris / Christopher Haddon6-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesClaire Thayer / Neville Mehta vs Dana McKillop / Christopher Graham6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesSally Murdoch / Brian Jones vs Darci Keljo / Tom Sloan7-5, 6-3
2019-03-09Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesClaire Thayer / Marc DeSantis vs Ashleigh Kayser / Vilath Oudomphong6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLisa Symmonds / Bruce Sylva vs Sherry Rogers / Mark Griffin6-4, 6-2
2019-02-24Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesSally Murdoch / Sam Aiello vs Theresa Mullally / Agus Rusli6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJana Hirst / Michael Yee vs Denielle Edlund / Patrick Maginnis7-5, 6-3
2019-02-23Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesBruce Sylva / Lisa Symmonds vs Vincent Scopacasa / Nenette Olson6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesNeville Mehta / Sally Murdoch vs James Feeney / Theresa Mallari6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMarc DeSantis / Naomi Steinberg vs Joonie Kaneshige / Jennifer Andrieu6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2019-02-02Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesSally Murdoch / Neville Mehta vs Mary Hlady / Lance Campbell4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJana Hirst / Michael Yee vs Denise Huth / Jeremy Huth7-5, 7-6
2019-01-27Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesClaire Thayer / Marc DeSantis vs Michele Waite / John Bard6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSally Murdoch / Neville Mehta vs Cindy Rushall / Roger Gwin6-3, 7-5
2019-01-18Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesSally Murdoch / Brian Jones vs Ke Ounaphom / Amy Bucher7-5, 7-6
L#2 DoublesNaomi Steinberg / Randolph Splitter vs Tony Khamsouk / Susan Ford6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesMichael Yee / Jana Hirst vs Bruce Herkamp / Jennie Brawn6-7, 7-5, 1-0
2019-01-13Lost 0–1
L#2 DoublesMichael Yee / Jana Hirst vs Jim Wheeler / Rise Hawley7-6, 6-3
2019-01-04Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesJana Hirst / Michael Yee vs David Sefton / Sharon Kim-Geib7-5, 6-3
L#2 DoublesNaomi Steinberg / Jack Carlson vs Shari Levelle / Rodger DeGeorge6-2, 6-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Bruce Sylva
16W–15L career
not enough data
—
4.5
Michael Yee
87W–89L career · type M
0%97%2%
4.25
4
Claire Thayer
136W–67L career
0%98%2%
3.84
4
Sally Murdoch
42W–35L career · type M
5%93%2%
3.75
4
Marc DeSantis
56W–37L career
11%88%0%
3.64
4
Jack Carlson
33W–50L career
62%38%0%
3.40
3.5
Neville Mehta
113W–80L career
0%99%0%
3.26
3
Jana Hirst
33W–66L career
0%66%34%
3.03
3
Randolph Splitter
7W–30L career
7%87%6%
2.76

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.