Teams

SATL70/PKooistra/YMCA

SCTA Adult 70 & Over (3.0-4.0, 9.0) · Men 3.5

5 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-04-15vs SATA 3.5M 70 & Over (Jennings)Lost 02
L#2 DoublesWayne Breon / Larry Wendling vs Emmett Ivey / Biron Vaughan0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesRobert Marx / Cary Grant vs Kurt Benz / Christopher Lawrence2-6, 6-7
2026-04-08vs SATA 3.5M 70 & Over (Jennings)Lost 12
W#1 DoublesGeary Angermeier / Doug Clark vs William Humphries / Roy Shelton7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesWayne Breon / Larry Wendling vs Jack Moyer / Biron Vaughan1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesCary Grant / Paul Kooistra vs Charles Jennings / Kurt Benz7-6, 6-7, 0-1
2026-03-25vs SATA 3.5M 70 & Over (Jennings)Split 11
W#1 DoublesDoug Clark / Geary Angermeier vs Jack Moyer / Kurt Benz6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesRobert Marx / Cary Grant vs Emmett Ivey / Roy Shelton1-6, 0-6
2026-03-11vs SATA 3.5M 70 & Over (Jennings)Lost 12
W#1 DoublesDoug Clark / Geary Angermeier vs Christopher Lawrence / Jack Moyer6-4, 7-6
L#2 DoublesCary Grant / Paul Kooistra vs Charles Jennings / Roy Shelton1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesRobert Marx / Larry Wendling vs Biron Vaughan / Kurt Benz2-6, 1-6
2026-03-04vs SATA 3.5M 70 & Over (Jennings)Lost 12
W#1 DoublesGeary Angermeier / Doug Clark vs Christopher Lawrence / Roy Shelton6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesRobert Marx / Larry Wendling vs William Humphries / Jack Moyer1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesCary Grant / Paul Kooistra vs Emmett Ivey / Biron Vaughan2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.96 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.18
Geary Angermeier
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.95
Paul Kooistra
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.92
Robert Marx
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.92
Cary Grant
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.82
Wayne Breon
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cary Grant + Paul Kooistra0531% gamesnot enough data
Geary Angermeier + Wayne Breon044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Geary Angermeier
11W–15L career · 4 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18
Paul Kooistra
4W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
63%37%<1%
2.95
Robert Marx
3W–18L career · 4 lines in 2026
72%28%<1%
2.92
3.5
Cary Grant
2W–11L career · 5 lines in 2026
73%27%<1%
2.92
Wayne Breon
1W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
90%10%<1%
2.82

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.