Teams

Escambia/Tran/40&Over7.0MXD

2024 Escambia Mixed 40 & Over · 7.0 Mixed 40 & Over

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-02-07vs Wallace - RS ClayWon 10
W#3 DoublesCarl Miller / Liz Payne vs Ethan Rhone / Erin Rhone4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2024-01-31vs McElhany - PCCLost 02
L#1 DoublesMarina Agadzi / Victor Agadzi vs Michael Yager / April Schweigert3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesWade Wilson / Liz Payne vs Shamus Prindiville / Alycia Esmonde6-1, 1-6, 0-1
2024-01-24vs Bonsignore - RS ClayWon 10
W#3 DoublesJonathan Llanera / Marina Agadzi vs Gordon Paulus / Jennifer Johnson6-1, 7-5
2024-01-15vs Wallace - RS ClayLost 02
L#2 DoublesNick Farkas / Kristyn Miller vs George Rials / Jacqueline Wallace6-2, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMarina Agadzi / Victor Agadzi vs John Wimberly / Mecy Wimberly1-6, 2-6
2024-01-11Won 20
W#2 DoublesCarl Miller / Liz Payne vs John M Kizziah / Thuy Nguyen6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesNick Farkas / Kristyn Miller vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-01-09vs Bonsignore - RS ClaySplit 11
L#1 DoublesWade Wilson / Liz Payne vs Susan Bonsignore / Jim Smith4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesNick Farkas / Kristyn Miller vs Gordon Paulus / Jennifer Johnson6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Mixed 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.59
Marina Agadzi
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.53
Nick Farkas
published
3.52
Kristyn Miller
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.28
Wade Wilson
published
3.20
Denise Wilson
published 3.5
3.15
Clay Anderson
published 3.5
2.92
Victor Agadzi
published
2.91
Liz Payne
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.84
Jonathan Llanera
published
2.62
Jaymes Tran
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Wade Wilson + Denise Wilson7256% games+2.1% vs expected
Kristyn Miller + Clay Anderson213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Marina Agadzi
42W–59L career · 3 lines in 2024
27%73%<1%
3.59
Nick Farkas
47W–20L career · no lines in 2024
<1%42%58%
3.53
Kristyn Miller
134W–112L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%45%55%
3.52
Wade Wilson
24W–22L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Denise Wilson
13W–11L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Clay Anderson
32W–19L career · no lines in 2024
15%85%1%
3.15
Victor Agadzi
7W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%72%28%
2.92
Liz Payne
139W–105L career · 8 lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
2.91
Jonathan Llanera
22W–10L career · no lines in 2024
1%87%12%
2.84
Jaymes Tran
2W–5L career · no lines in 2024
20%79%<1%
2.62

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.