Teams

SD WE NLT Balboa TC/ La Crue

2025 SoCal Tri-Level Doubles WE- Summer SD · SDNC

13 players · average NTRP 3.36 / SAN DIEGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for SDNC have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
Suzanne Pham
published 3.5
3.41
Kaili Ghio
published 3.5
3.40
Megumi Bolger
published 3.5
3.30
Amy Tran
published 3.5
3.24
Monica La Crue
published 3.5
3.18
Hayley Moore
published 3.5
3.18
Amelia Desiderio
published 3.5
3.08
Kara Henderson
published
2.92
Marisa Alvarado
published 3
2.80
Angela Christian
published 3
2.65
Hanan Hanna
published 3
2.44
Robin Delaney
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marisa Alvarado + Monica La Crue12459% games+7.8% vs expected
Kaili Ghio + Monica La Crue3259% games+6.8% vs expected
Hayley Moore + Monica La Crue2346% games+3.5% vs expected
Kara Henderson + Angela Christian213 matchesnot enough data
Kaili Ghio + Amelia Desiderio123 matchesnot enough data
Kaili Ghio + Megumi Bolger213 matchesnot enough data
Amelia Desiderio + Monica La Crue213 matchesnot enough data
Megumi Bolger + Suzanne Pham303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Suzanne Pham
49W–28L career · no lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
3.44
3.5
Kaili Ghio
59W–22L career · no lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
3.41
3.5
Megumi Bolger
48W–22L career · no lines in 2025
<1%78%21%
3.40
3.5
Viktoriia Belonogova
70W–33L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Amy Tran
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Monica La Crue
57W–33L career · no lines in 2025
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Hayley Moore
5W–6L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Amelia Desiderio
7W–14L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%1%
3.18
Kara Henderson
17W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%27%73%
3.08
3
Marisa Alvarado
49W–36L career · no lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
2.92
3
Angela Christian
52W–50L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Hanan Hanna
13W–9L career · no lines in 2025
12%88%<1%
2.65
Robin Delaney
3W–8L career · no lines in 2025
0%68%32%
2.44

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.