Teams

HH40/Howe/Shipyard

Adult 40 & Over · Adult Women 3.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.25 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Adult Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.93 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Lisa Sisko
published
Carrie Peterson
published 3.5
3.24
Gretchen Griggs
published 3.5
3.15
Amy Yaniero
published 3.5
3.07
Mary Howe
published
2.92
2.88
Sue Lievense
published
2.81
Dana Marsh
published 3
2.69
Felicia Neczypor
published 3
2.56
Pauline Delaughter
published
2.56
Susan Ramsey
published
Kimberly Hopkins
published
Sandi Riley
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dana Marsh + Felicia Neczypor2446% games−3.2% vs expected
Gretchen Griggs + Amy Yaniero2347% games−3.6% vs expected
Mary Howe + Gretchen Griggs123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lisa Sisko
63W–34L career · no lines in 2022
<1%78%22%
3.40
3.5
Carrie Peterson
37W–13L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Gretchen Griggs
61W–25L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Amy Yaniero
23W–7L career · no lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.15
Mary Howe
24W–38L career · no lines in 2022
30%70%<1%
3.07
3
Birgit Koellner-Gozlan
20W–28L career · no lines in 2022
<1%74%26%
2.92
Sue Lievense
19W–15L career · no lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
2.88
3
Dana Marsh
40W–25L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
2.81
3
Felicia Neczypor
62W–65L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
2.69
Pauline Delaughter
12W–24L career · no lines in 2022
32%68%<1%
2.56
Susan Ramsey
16W–56L career · no lines in 2022
33%67%<1%
2.56
Kimberly Hopkins
3W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Sandi Riley
4W–11L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.