Teams

Haray

2025 Tri Level Women · Silver: 4.0,3.5,3.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.44 / WESTERN REGION

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-05-04vs Spottek SilverLost 02
L#2 DoublesBryce Farrell / Laure Weaver vs Brenda Myers / Julia Miller5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAlicia Beekman / Gina Callahan vs Mindy Swails / Sue Burns2-6, 5-7
2025-04-27vs Western: Yelena’s SilverWon 21
L#1 DoublesJennifer Small / Ali Krowiak vs Theresa Price / Emily Esther4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesBryce Farrell / Kim Yuhnick vs Amy Paulsen / Michaela DiLorenzo1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTara Kaminsky / Patricia Noel vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-04-06vs Spottek SilverLost 12
L#1 DoublesPatricia Noel / Alicia Beekman vs Sue Burns / Mindy Swails5-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesDawn Worden / Laure Weaver vs Kristen Starke / Nancy Siegel6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesJennifer Small / Erica Haray vs Anne Carter / Cheryl Jones3-6, 4-6
2025-03-30vs Western: Yelena’s SilverLost 12
L#1 DoublesKim Yuhnick / Ali Krowiak vs Yelena Reporyeva / Theresa Price1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesErica Haray / Jennifer Small vs Ewelina Zajac-Holdrege / Anna Norris6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesGina Callahan / Tara Kaminsky vs Stephanie Allen / Michaela DiLorenzo6-2, 1-6, 0-1
2025-03-08vs Spottek SilverLost 02
L#2 DoublesLaure Weaver / Bryce Farrell vs Brenda Myers / Megan Gillespie6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesErica Haray / Dawn Worden vs Amanda Spottek / Julia Miller2-6, 3-6
2025-03-01vs Western: Yelena’s SilverLost 12
L#1 DoublesErica Haray / Ali Krowiak vs Theresa Price / Emily Esther2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDawn Worden / Laure Weaver vs Ewelina Zajac-Holdrege / Anna Norris6-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesTara Kaminsky / Gina Callahan vs Kayla Davis / Lisa Kerns2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-02-15vs Spottek SilverLost 03
L#1 DoublesAlicia Beekman / Gina Callahan vs Mindy Swails / Juliet Concilla1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJennifer Small / Laure Weaver vs Kristen Starke / Barbara Mirch6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAmy Donovan / Michelle Porterfield vs Amanda Spottek / Cheryl Jones2-6, 0-6
2025-02-09vs Western: Yelena’s SilverLost 12
L#1 DoublesAli Krowiak / Erica Haray vs Paulette Weinheimer / Emily Esther6-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJennifer Small / Kim Yuhnick vs Ewelina Zajac-Holdrege / Anna Norris1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesPatricia Noel / Tara Kaminsky vs Kayla Davis / Amy Paulsen6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · Silver: 4.0,3.5,3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Western: Yelena’s Silver7117716162
2Spottek Silver44131125208
3Haray1761838253

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Ali Krowiak
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.41
Jennifer Small
published
3.27
Dawn Worden
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Amy Donovan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Bryce Farrell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Erica Haray
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.00
Tara Kaminsky
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.98
Kim Yuhnick
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.92
Patricia Noel
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.88
Alicia Beekman
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.59
Gina Callahan
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
Laure Weaver
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Michelle Porterfield
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Erica Haray + Jennifer Small4457% games+8.5% vs expected
Erica Haray + Kim Yuhnick3248% games+3.0% vs expected
Michelle Porterfield + Amy Donovan171851% games−2.7% vs expected
Tara Kaminsky + Gina Callahan51042% games−3.9% vs expected
Erica Haray + Laure Weaver1536% games−18.3% vs expected
Erica Haray + Dawn Worden0535% gamesnot enough data
Kim Yuhnick + Jennifer Small303 matchesnot enough data
Dawn Worden + Laure Weaver123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ali Krowiak
38W–51L career · 5 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.73
Jennifer Small
25W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%75%24%
3.41
3.5
Dawn Worden
68W–39L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Amy Donovan
18W–23L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Bryce Farrell
7W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Erica Haray
83W–102L career · 6 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.17
Tara Kaminsky
40W–42L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%52%48%
3.00
3.5
Kim Yuhnick
72W–75L career · 3 lines in 2025
57%43%<1%
2.98
Patricia Noel
19W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
2.92
3
Alicia Beekman
13W–20L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
2.88
3
Gina Callahan
27W–41L career · 4 lines in 2025
23%76%<1%
2.59
Laure Weaver
14W–32L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Michelle Porterfield
34W–37L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.