← Teams

MV-Harbell

2020 Mixed 18 & Over · 6.0 Mixed

7 players · average NTRP 3.33 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.67 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.67
Alex Harbell
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published 4
—
Michael Lemmons
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
—
Stephanie Harbell
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3
—
Craig Mcreary
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #3 Doubles 36% · published 0
—
Dennis Yalch
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 0
—
Patricia Kuchar
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 0
—
Randy Walker
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 0
Results15 ties
2019-11-24Lost 0–1
L#2 DoublesTony Chennault / Stephanie Harbell vs Boon Yon Joung / Hoon Shin6-2, 6-4
2019-11-22Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesDoug Jones / Stephanie Harbell vs Eric Ayers / Jane King Ayers7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesPatricia Kuchar / Alex Harbell vs Manoj Agnihotri / Dipali Dixit6-1, 6-3
2019-11-17Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesRoger Gwin / Stephanie Harbell vs Wei Pan / Claudia Belindean6-4, 6-2
2019-11-16Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesStephanie Harbell / Michael Lemmons vs Mikayla Posey / Humberto Gomez6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesCraig Mcreary / Julie Mcreary vs Miguel Diaz de Leon / Angela Diaz de Leon6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesBianca LEMMONS / Dennis Yalch vs Dario Soriano / Samanta Rodriguez Silva6-0, 6-0
2019-11-10Won 1–0
W#3 DoublesStephanie Harbell / Roger Gwin vs David Lee / Kelly Bartlett6-2, 7-6
2019-11-09Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesStephanie Harbell / Tony Chennault vs Lisa Howlett / Jesse Inkpen7-6, 6-1
2019-10-27Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesAlex Harbell / Patricia Kuchar vs Manoj Agnihotri / Jane King Ayers6-1, 6-3
2019-10-19Won 2–0
W#2 DoublesAlex Harbell / Patricia Kuchar vs Rodrigo Martinez / Virginia Martinez6-4, 6-0
W#3 DoublesStephanie Harbell / Dennis Yalch vs Matt Savage / Maryann Velez6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2019-10-19Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesStephanie Harbell / Tony Chennault vs Clay Funkhouser / Jan Funkhouser6-0, 6-0
2019-10-13Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesKaren Walker / Michael Lemmons vs Carly Vendegna / Carlos Silvas3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJulie Mcreary / Craig Mcreary vs Joshua Visick / Parish Burns6-3, 6-3
2019-10-06Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesTony Chennault / Stephanie Harbell vs Gregg Palmer / Shannon Roarke7-6, 6-2
2019-09-28Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesKaren Walker / Michael Lemmons vs Manoj Pandya / Paula Stiefel6-1, 6-1
2019-09-22Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesStephanie Harbell / Maxwell Fisher vs Kourtnie Katayama / Gabriel Barroso Mendoza6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesBianca LEMMONS / Randy Walker vs Samanta Rodriguez Silva / Arturo Barroso7-6, 6-3
2019-09-22Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesStephanie Harbell / Tony Chennault vs Danielle Cuenco / David Wolman6-2, 7-6
2019-09-15Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesStephanie Harbell / Maxwell Fisher vs Anh Nguyen / Michael Ogden6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKaren Walker / Randy Walker vs Kerri Monello / Sam Lumetta4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJulie Mcreary / Craig Mcreary vs Michelle Jordan / Ray Lee6-2, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Alex Harbell
127W–53L career
5%95%0%
3.67
3
Michael Lemmons
25W–30L career
not enough data
—
3
Stephanie Harbell
70W–26L career
not enough data
—
0
Craig Mcreary
45W–43L career
not enough data
—
0
Dennis Yalch
14W–26L career
not enough data
—
0
Patricia Kuchar
24W–44L career
not enough data
—
0
Randy Walker
20W–27L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.