Teams

Troyke/SH

2025 TUL ADULT 18 & Over League · 2.5 WOMEN

12 players · average NTRP 2.50 / OKLAHOMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-05-22vs Welch/TTCWon 21
W#1 DoublesDesiree Rashid / Mindy Nowlin vs Reagan Welch / Krystal Williams6-0, 7-6
W#1 SinglesKaysi Moore vs Tara OMahony6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMadison Graves / Erin Lemmerman vs Nina Butchko / Jaye Downs5-7, 3-6
2025-05-15vs McCaskill/LFLost 12
W#1 DoublesSamantha Renner / Madison Graves vs Angela Yelich / Tia Hill6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesStephanie Gibbs vs Kim Lauer4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesStephanie Zito / Erin Lemmerman vs Rashell Ruefly / Danyel Cousins6-0, 3-6, 0-1
2025-05-08vs Horvath/LFWon 21
W#1 DoublesStephanie Gibbs / Stephanie Zito vs Lindsay Boyles / Juell Homco6-2, 6-3
L#1 SinglesMadison Graves vs Maddie Morris5-7, 0-6
W#2 DoublesSamantha Renner / Erin Yancy vs Brook Durham / Tracey Farmer6-4, 6-1
2025-04-28vs Briley/LFWon 30
W#1 DoublesMadison Graves / Desiree Rashid vs Carla Grogg / Jorjana Marx6-4, 7-5
W#1 SinglesKaysi Moore vs Patty Eaton7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesTiffany Fifer / Erin Lemmerman vs Katy Green / Nicole McDaniel6-2, 6-0
2025-04-23vs Orange 2: Maguire/LFLost 03
L#1 DoublesSamantha Renner / Desiree Rashid vs Elizabeth Skelton / Haddi Nunley4-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesStephanie Gibbs vs Katie Raper-Cavener1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesStephanie Zito / Meghan Cannon vs Crystal Maguire / Crystal Franks1-6, 0-6
2025-04-17vs Nicholas/LFWon 21
W#1 DoublesErin Lemmerman / Stephanie Gibbs vs Ashley Humphrey / Ellie Carlberg6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMindy Nowlin vs Aislyn Clark6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMeghan Cannon / Madison Graves vs Anna Lukes / Katie Nicholas5-7, 4-6
2025-04-08vs Cole/LFWon 30
W#1 DoublesStephanie Gibbs / Erin Yancy vs Lauren Lane / Molly Royce7-6, 7-6
W#1 SinglesDesiree Rashid vs Courtney Cullison6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMindy Nowlin / Erin Lemmerman vs Annie Higgins / Sarah Lueck5-7, 7-5, 1-0
2025-04-02vs Gulledge/ISLost 12
L#1 DoublesErin Lemmerman / Tiffany Fifer vs Robyn Cowan / Brenda Biles4-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesStephanie Gibbs vs Michelle Bergwall3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesDesiree Rashid / Mindy Nowlin vs Tammy Mattox / Karen Butts4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-03-27vs Tulsa Spring/Kirkpatrick 2.5/GRLost 12
L#1 DoublesStephanie Zito / Erin Yancy vs Audrey Reeves / Bonnie Presley1-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesKaysi Moore vs Lindsey Kirkpatrick6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesBetsy Little / Madison Graves vs Stephanie Chang / Evie Stover3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 WOMEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.26 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.44
Samantha Renner
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.40
Kaysi Moore
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.38
Madison Graves
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.34
Stephanie Gibbs
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.34
Stephanie Zito
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.30
Betsy Little
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.27
Tiffany Fifer
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.23
Mindy Nowlin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.20
Desiree Rashid
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 2.5
2.11
Erin Yancy
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
1.87
Erin Lemmerman
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Meghan Cannon
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mindy Nowlin + Desiree Rashid6354% games+8.9% vs expected
Stephanie Zito + Erin Yancy2344% games−2.3% vs expected
Tiffany Fifer + Erin Lemmerman224 matchesnot enough data
Tiffany Fifer + Mindy Nowlin303 matchesnot enough data
Tiffany Fifer + Desiree Rashid303 matchesnot enough data
Samantha Renner + Stephanie Gibbs213 matchesnot enough data
Stephanie Gibbs + Erin Yancy123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Samantha Renner
9W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%65%35%
2.44
Kaysi Moore
7W–22L career · 3 lines in 2025
77%23%<1%
2.40
Madison Graves
11W–7L career · 6 lines in 2025
0%79%21%
2.38
Stephanie Gibbs
14W–18L career · 6 lines in 2025
0%87%13%
2.34
Stephanie Zito
7W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%88%12%
2.34
2.5
Betsy Little
3W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
0%92%8%
2.30
Tiffany Fifer
10W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%95%5%
2.27
Mindy Nowlin
11W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%97%3%
2.23
2.5
Desiree Rashid
15W–8L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%98%2%
2.20
Erin Yancy
4W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.11
Erin Lemmerman
4W–9L career · 6 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.87
Meghan Cannon
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.