Teams

EHTC:Kicking Aces:Musick/

2023 NCT Tri Level Women · 3.0 Tri Level Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.12 / NORTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-12-07vs GTC:Love at First Serve:Mabe/RammLost 01
L#1 DoublesCheyenne Brindle / Elizabeth Mills vs Xia Lu / Kim Consoli4-6, 2-6
2023-11-27vs GTC:Love at First Serve:Mabe/RammLost 01
L#1 DoublesElyse Post Perez / Tenley Phillips vs Xia Lu / Melissa Mabe5-7, 2-6
2023-11-19vs BSF:Slice girls:Langlais/HartWon 10
W#1 DoublesCheyenne Brindle / Elyse Post Perez vs Nancy Langlais / JoAnne Mahonski7-6, 6-2
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Mills / Tenley Phillips vs Kristen Horrigan / Kristina Schumann0-6, 7-6, 1-0
2023-10-25vs GTC:Love at First Serve:Mabe/RammWon 10
W#1 DoublesElyse Post Perez / Huanran Musick vs JoAnne Ramm / Melinda Smith7-6, 7-6
2023-10-17vs RFL:Double Vision:Schumann/CirelliLost 01
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Mills / Huanran Musick vs Kristen Horrigan / Lisa Levine5-7, 5-7
2023-10-10vs BSF:Slice girls:Langlais/HartWon 10
W#1 DoublesCheyenne Brindle / Elizabeth Mills vs Kimberlee Hart / JoAnne Mahonski6-4, 7-5
W#1 DoublesTenley Phillips / Stephanie Foster vs Bridget Cirelli / Kristen Horrigan6-3, 7-5
2023-09-21vs BSF:Slice girls:Langlais/HartLost 01
L#1 DoublesCheyenne Brindle / Stephanie Foster vs Nancy Langlais / Kelly MacBeth3-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 3.0 Tri Level Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GTC:Love at First Serve:Mabe/Ramm0954876
2EHTC:Kicking Aces:Musick/0954999
3BSF:Slice girls:Langlais/Hart09451292
4RFL:Double Vision:Schumann/Cirelli09451299

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.98 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.51
Elyse Post Perez
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.04
Cheyenne Brindle
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.85
Huanran Musick
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.77
Elizabeth Mills
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.75
Tenley Phillips
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Stephanie Foster
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elizabeth Mills + Cheyenne Brindle3252% games−1.9% vs expected
Elizabeth Mills + Huanran Musick123 matchesnot enough data
Cheyenne Brindle + Huanran Musick213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Elyse Post Perez
103W–35L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%46%54%
3.51
3
Cheyenne Brindle
106W–58L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%36%64%
3.04
3
Huanran Musick
69W–57L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%87%13%
2.85
3
Elizabeth Mills
45W–120L career · 4 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
2.77
Tenley Phillips
84W–49L career · 3 lines in 2023
3%95%2%
2.75
Stephanie Foster
84W–32L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.