Teams

Sorrow

2024 Combo 55 & Over-Chattanooga · 8.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 4.12 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Flight standings1 teams · 8.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Sorrow000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.72 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Gina Salisbury
published 4.5
3.88
Missy Bagwell
published
3.75
Tammy Kilgore
published
Chari Buckner
published 4
3.75
Bettina Briggs
published 4
3.69
Stacy Sorrow
published
3.55
Felice Hadden
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
Susan Kerr
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Gina Salisbury
4W–7L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Missy Bagwell
5W–17L career · no lines in 2024
83%17%<1%
3.88
Tammy Kilgore
33W–22L career · no lines in 2024
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Chari Buckner
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Bettina Briggs
18W–9L career · no lines in 2024
3%95%3%
3.75
Stacy Sorrow
46W–34L career · no lines in 2024
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Felice Hadden
19W–21L career · 2 lines in 2024
35%65%<1%
3.55
Susan Kerr
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.