Teams

Clark, Michael

2025 Adult 18 & Over-JXN · Men 4.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.67 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-04-14vs Nguyen, TamLost 03
L#1 DoublesEli Sykes / Elkin Crews vs Doug Burgess / Kevin McKay6-7, 4-6
L#1 SinglesTyler Mcintyre vs Matthew Gordon4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesBlake Kennedy / Matt Carpenter vs Scott Stanton / Chandler Strain3-6, 4-6
2025-04-13vs Hardin, JeffLost 02
L#1 DoublesBlake Kennedy / Zach Myrick vs Daniel Phyfer / Paige Purvis2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesTravis Finseth / Matt Carpenter vs Lane Clower / Brian Cronin0-6, 2-6
2025-03-31vs Howell, BryanLost 04
L#1 DoublesBlake Kennedy / Lance Miller vs Nick Morgan / Andrew Haile0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesChris Lee / Reuben Harvey vs Trey Clark / Bryan Barksdale2-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesNico Jimeno vs Bryce Ishee0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesEli Sykes / Elkin Crews vs Bryan Howell / Will Russell Ward4-6, 4-6
2025-03-24vs Norton, BrandonWon 31
W#1 DoublesChris Lee / Reuben Harvey vs Bryton Hixson / Sourav Dutta6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesBlake Kennedy / Matt Carpenter vs Jason Griffin / Moin Imran4-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesTyler Mcintyre vs Thaddeus Welch7-6, 7-5
W#3 DoublesLance Miller / Luke Armstrong vs Greg Williamson / Phillip Pace7-5, 6-2
2025-03-03vs Nguyen, TamLost 13
L#1 DoublesElkin Crews / Reuben Harvey vs Matthew Gordon / Chandler Strain0-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesTyler Mcintyre vs Jeffie Blake Smith3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesChris Lee / Zach Myrick vs Doug Burgess / Tim Davis6-3, 7-6
L#3 DoublesMatt Carpenter / Blake Kennedy vs Scott Stanton / Kevin McKay1-6, 5-7
2025-02-17vs Howell, BryanSplit 22
W#1 DoublesChris Lee / Zach Myrick vs Will Russell Ward / Niven Walker7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMatt Carpenter / Travis Finseth vs Jonathan Sims / Daniel Pendleton7-6, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesNico Jimeno vs Reed Wade2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesEli Sykes / Elkin Crews vs Andrew Stubbs / John Hogan4-6, 4-6
2025-02-10vs Norton, BrandonSplit 22
L#1 DoublesNico Jimeno / Joseph Hitt vs Jay Irving / Moin Imran6-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesBlake Kennedy / Matt Carpenter vs Rahul Chaddha / John Louis6-2, 6-4
L#2 SinglesLuke Armstrong vs Drew Green1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesEli Sykes / Elkin Crews vs Dick Whitaker / Phillip Pace6-0, 0-6, 1-0
2025-02-03vs Hardin, JeffLost 03
L#1 DoublesEli Sykes / Elkin Crews vs Joseph Oliver / Lane Clower1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesChris Lee / Mitch Rayborn vs Daniel Phyfer / Jeffrey Carmody2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesBlake Kennedy / Matt Carpenter vs Paige Purvis / Alan McCormick5-7, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · Men 4.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Hardin, Jeff7133719291
2Howell, Bryan71291125294
3Clark, Michael17122860436
4Norton, Brandon1783267447

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.45 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Mitch Rayborn
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.62
Nico Jimeno
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.62
Travis Finseth
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.58
Elkin Crews
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.43
Blake Kennedy
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published 3.5
3.34
Luke Armstrong
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Eli Sykes
usually #3 Doubles 64%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published 3.5
3.19
Reuben Harvey
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.17
Scott Holston
published
3.16
Tyler Mcintyre
usually #1 Singles 30%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Joseph Hitt
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published
Zach Myrick
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Eli Sykes + Blake Kennedy6355% games+10.5% vs expected
Elkin Crews + Eli Sykes1440% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mitch Rayborn
28W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.90
Nico Jimeno
44W–15L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%17%83%
3.62
Travis Finseth
24W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.62
4
Elkin Crews
7W–15L career · 6 lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.58
3.5
Blake Kennedy
40W–31L career · 14 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.43
Luke Armstrong
4W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
90%10%<1%
3.34
3.5
Eli Sykes
12W–20L career · 11 lines in 2025
not enough data
Reuben Harvey
18W–21L career · 8 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.19
Scott Holston
37W–51L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%<1%
3.17
Tyler Mcintyre
19W–21L career · 9 lines in 2025
10%89%<1%
3.16
Joseph Hitt
12W–4L career · 8 lines in 2025
not enough data
Zach Myrick
2W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.