Teams

LCTA18/Cirifalco,/Dunes West

2022 LCTA 18 & Over Fall League · 18 & over Fall League Women 2.5 Day

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2023-10-11vs LCTA18/Cooke/MPRDWon 21
W#1 DoublesNicole Cirifalco / Veronica Hein vs Brantli McMillan / Clancie Barley6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesDonna Condon vs Paige Newton6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesLaurie Gamliel / Melinda Zegas vs Brandi Cooke / Tiffany Senden3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & over Fall League Women 2.5 Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.62 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.79
Ann Tinker
published 3
2.77
Bobbie Doyle
published 3
2.75
Veronica Hein
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.65
Melinda Zegas
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.62
Nicole Cirifalco
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.50
Donna Condon
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.48
2.35
Wendy Zettel
published
Laurie Gamliel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Pamela Lerner
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Veronica Hein + Melinda Zegas7166% games+17.6% vs expected
Nicole Cirifalco + Ann Tinker6066% games+11.9% vs expected
Laurie Gamliel + Eliana Enriquez Coyle4160% games+4.2% vs expected
Nicole Cirifalco + Veronica Hein181054% games+1.3% vs expected
Laurie Gamliel + Melinda Zegas2339% gamesnot enough data
Donna Condon + Pamela Lerner224 matchesnot enough data
Nicole Cirifalco + Eliana Enriquez Coyle123 matchesnot enough data
Eliana Enriquez Coyle + Bobbie Doyle123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Ann Tinker
55W–85L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%5%
2.79
3
Bobbie Doyle
46W–47L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
2.77
Veronica Hein
61W–49L career · 1 line in 2022
2%95%3%
2.75
Melinda Zegas
60W–63L career · 1 line in 2022
12%88%<1%
2.65
Nicole Cirifalco
48W–39L career · 1 line in 2022
17%82%<1%
2.62
3
Donna Condon
39W–68L career · 1 line in 2022
49%51%<1%
2.50
3
Eliana Enriquez Coyle
13W–12L career · no lines in 2022
56%44%<1%
2.48
Wendy Zettel
7W–28L career · no lines in 2022
87%13%<1%
2.35
Laurie Gamliel
10W–11L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Pamela Lerner
36W–31L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.