Teams

Yadkin/Ivester/18 4.0

2025 Yadkin Valley Mixed 18 & Over · Mixed 4.0 - Monday Evening

13 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-06-16vs Yadkin/Reilly-Mcmillen/18 4.0Won 30
W#1 DoublesJessie Carter / Mason Norman vs Kimberly Busse / Matthew Wright6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMartha Benbow / Josh Ivester vs Holly Hinshelwood / Davis Phanthalack6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesWhitney Ellis / Patrick Pochop vs Jocelyn Moye / Joe Peele6-2, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Mixed 4.0 - Monday Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.83 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.07
4.00
Mason Norman
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.98
Jessica Bair-Epps
published
3.94
Ranganadh Vemuri
published
3.90
Whitney Ellis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.86
Taylor McDaniel
published
3.74
Jessie Carter
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.73
Patrick Pochop
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.67
Ted Irvin
published
3.64
Jennifer Mays
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.63
Josh Ivester
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Martha Benbow
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Nadia Gregory
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ted Irvin + Jennifer Mays6349% games+4.1% vs expected
Nadia Gregory + Mason Norman6068% gamesnot enough data
Ted Irvin + Whitney Ellis224 matchesnot enough data
Taylor McDaniel + Jennifer Mays123 matchesnot enough data
Taylor McDaniel + Bridget Gislimberti213 matchesnot enough data
Josh Ivester + Bridget Gislimberti213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Bridget Gislimberti
45W–22L career · no lines in 2025
<1%32%68%
4.07
Mason Norman
21W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
49%51%<1%
4.00
Jessica Bair-Epps
16W–18L career · no lines in 2025
55%45%<1%
3.98
Ranganadh Vemuri
18W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
3.94
Whitney Ellis
48W–27L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%77%23%
3.90
Taylor McDaniel
14W–9L career · no lines in 2025
1%84%16%
3.86
Jessie Carter
11W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%3%
3.74
Patrick Pochop
8W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
Ted Irvin
26W–25L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.67
Jennifer Mays
70W–41L career · 3 lines in 2025
16%84%1%
3.64
Josh Ivester
24W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.63
Martha Benbow
6W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Nadia Gregory
13W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.