Teams

Easley 18+ 7.5 Combo

2022 Piedmont Combo 18 & Over · 7.5 Women 18 & Over

13 players · average NTRP 3.67 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-09-29vs DEAN - 18+ 7.5WLost 01
L#3 DoublesGinger Hayworth / Elaine Fox vs Carrie Ganim / Diane Majestic0-6, 1-6
2022-09-22vs Dulin - 18+ 7.5WWon 10
W#2 DoublesElaine Fox / Leah Schweitzer vs Sue Blanchard / Marie-Lyne Lavoie6-4, 1-6
2022-09-15vs Westrick - 18+ 7.5WLost 01
L#1 DoublesMarissa Klee / Karyn Efird vs Rhyssa Earley / Sally Eagleton1-6, 4-6
2022-09-08vs Goy/Walker 18+ 7.5WWon 10
W#1 DoublesMarissa Klee / Karyn Efird vs Penny Trivette / Judiann Georgevich3-6, 7-6, 1-0
2022-08-25vs DEAN - 18+ 7.5WWon 10
W#1 DoublesMarissa Klee / Karyn Efird vs Carolyn Pellerin / Carrie Ganim6-3, 6-2
2022-08-18vs Dulin - 18+ 7.5WSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMarissa Klee / Karyn Efird vs Susan Parsons / Robin Crosier6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesElaine Fox / Janice Gilman vs Amy Dulin / Catherine Tanner1-6, 2-6
2022-08-11Lost 01
L#3 DoublesElaine Fox / Karyn Efird vs Melissa Goodman / Cheryl Scott2-6, 1-6
2022-08-04vs Goy/Walker 18+ 7.5WLost 01
L#1 DoublesKaryn Efird / Virginia Easley vs Judiann Georgevich / Cari Powell4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Women 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.40 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Marissa Klee
published
3.77
Virginia Easley
published
3.67
Claire Parsons
published 4
3.65
Dell Barbee
published 4
3.58
Karyn Efird
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
3.27
Gladys Dunn
published 3.5
Angela Muller
published 3.5
Ginger Hayworth
published 3.5
3.22
Elaine Fox
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.21
Lisa Roach
published
3.11
Toni Lewis
published
3.10
Janice Gilman
published
2.97
Jill Elam
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karyn Efird + Elaine Fox2344% gamesnot enough data
Dell Barbee + Virginia Easley303 matchesnot enough data
Ginger Hayworth + Karyn Efird303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Marissa Klee
3W–4L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
3.85
Virginia Easley
25W–19L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Claire Parsons
1W–6L career · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.67
4
Dell Barbee
17W–15L career · no lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.65
Karyn Efird
256W–113L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%27%73%
3.58
3.5
Gladys Dunn
29W–22L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Angela Muller
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Ginger Hayworth
88W–42L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Elaine Fox
113W–96L career · 4 lines in 2022
5%94%2%
3.22
Lisa Roach
9W–8L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.21
Toni Lewis
12W–23L career · no lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.11
Janice Gilman
11W–16L career · no lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
3.10
Jill Elam
19W–31L career · no lines in 2022
59%41%<1%
2.97

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.