Teams

BBTL65/Ozdany/Sun City

Adult 65 & Over · Women's 3.0

6 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-06-11vs BBTL (A) 3.0W 65 & Over (Richards)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesPatricia Niarchos / Darcy Ozdany vs Linda Chasnov / Martha Widgen1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesBetsy Robinson / Debbie Venedam vs Joyce Addams / Elizabeth Grobler2-6, 1-6
2026-06-09vs BBTL65/Turino/Sun CityWon 21
W#1 DoublesMelinda Young / Debbie Venedam vs Janet Simpson / Ellen Hart6-2, 2-1
W#2 DoublesBetsy Robinson / Lori Clark vs Lydia Costa / Kristen Turino2-6, 3-4
L#3 DoublesCarol Macneil / Patricia Niarchos vs Lee Delieto / Kathy Kruger1-6, 2-6
2026-05-26vs BBTL65/Nye/SunCityLost 12
L#1 DoublesLori Clark / Betsy Robinson vs Joanne Patterson / Peggy Orendas2-6, 2-5
W#2 DoublesPatricia Niarchos / Darcy Ozdany vs Kim Payne / Michele Oltman6-0, 7-6
L#3 DoublesDonna Shriner / Carol Macneil vs Harriet Starkey / Jacinta ODriscoll2-6, 0-6
2026-05-19vs BBTL65/Williams/DatawSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMelinda Young / Betsy Robinson vs Jane Pfeffer / Kathleen Trice2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesDarcy Ozdany / Donna Shriner vs Linda Quirk / Marjorie Shymske6-1, 1-6, 1-0
2026-05-15vs HHTL65/Neczypor/ShipyardWon 21
L#1 DoublesLori Clark / Darcy Ozdany vs Dana Marsh / Lisa Britt1-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesDebbie Venedam / Melinda Young vs Deborah Palladino / Sharon Geiman6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesPatricia Niarchos / Betsy Robinson vs Robin Bloom / Gayle Curtiss7-5, 6-3
2026-04-28vs BBTL65/Wewer/CallawassieLost 03
L#1 DoublesBetsy Robinson / Patricia Niarchos vs Valerie Allis / Nell Kleinhans1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMelinda Young / Debbie Venedam vs Debby Fox / Deborah Dykes1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDonna Shriner / Rita Schweitzer vs Kelly Wewer / Brooke Cragan1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.53 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.68
Patricia Niarchos
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.64
Debbie Venedam
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.57
Betsy Robinson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.44
Darcy Ozdany
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.33
Donna Shriner
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Melinda Young
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Patricia Niarchos
12W–18L career · 5 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
2.68
3
Debbie Venedam
8W–15L career · type A · 4 lines in 2026
16%84%1%
2.64
3
Betsy Robinson
4W–19L career · type S · 6 lines in 2026
32%68%<1%
2.57
3
Darcy Ozdany
14W–24L career · 4 lines in 2026
68%32%<1%
2.44
Donna Shriner
8W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%89%11%
2.33
Melinda Young
5W–7L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.