Teams

MV HOOPER/HOOVER

2025 FW USTA Adult Fall Ladies N · A

17 players · average NTRP 2.88 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for A have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.83 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.36
Kim Milam
published
3.24
Amy Brenner
published 3.5
3.05
Mandy Kirwan
published
3.02
Charissa Kumar
published 3
3.01
Tricia Spann
published
2.92
Malea Grubb
published
2.87
Christine Hooper
published 3
2.78
Lauren Arias
published
2.75
Angel Baker
published 3
2.70
Christina Jacobs
published 3
2.27
Amber Snider
published 2.5
Christi McDowell
published 2.5
2.05
Debi Arias
published 2.5
Kari Jordan
published
Katie Irsaneous
published
Molly Milner
published
Vanessa Rutherford
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kari Jordan + Lauren Arias123 matchesnot enough data
Angel Baker + Christina Jacobs213 matchesnot enough data
Christine Hooper + Charissa Kumar213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kim Milam
25W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
3.36
3.5
Amy Brenner
4W–12L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24
Mandy Kirwan
6W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%37%63%
3.05
3
Charissa Kumar
25W–21L career · no lines in 2025
<1%45%55%
3.02
Tricia Spann
27W–25L career · no lines in 2025
<1%46%54%
3.01
Malea Grubb
3W–18L career · no lines in 2025
73%27%<1%
2.92
3
Christine Hooper
16W–19L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
2.87
Lauren Arias
7W–7L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Angel Baker
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
2.75
3
Christina Jacobs
15W–23L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%2%
2.70
2.5
Amber Snider
6W–3L career · no lines in 2025
0%95%5%
2.27
2.5
Christi McDowell
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Debi Arias
4W–4L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.05
Kari Jordan
7W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Katie Irsaneous
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Molly Milner
5W–7L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Vanessa Rutherford
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.