Teams

YMCA PRESIDIO CW6.5A

2025 COMBO · Women 6.5

26 players · average NTRP 3.18 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-10-04vs GLTF/GOLDMAN TC CW6.5BLost 12
L#1 DoublesNina Sheridan / Tracie Luong vs Amy Chin / Melodie Rubin2-6, 6-0, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAngela Bell / Bonnie Makovec vs CHRISTINE SUN / Theresa Cole6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesBarbara Bernard / Jessie Kolliner vs Lenelle Suliguin / Cortney Todd1-6, 0-6
2025-09-28vs GOLDEN GATEWY CW6.5ALost 03
L#1 DoublesMaria Alvarez / Madeleine Clark vs Cassie Coggeshall / Joyce Noah-Vanhoucke6-2, 6-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJacqueline Maloney / Kristine Delagnes vs Ayse Hortacsu / Natalie Wong3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Coryell / Sarah Howard vs Teresa Martinique Kelley / Esther Kim2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.98 estimated across 20 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
Elizabeth Lougee
published 4
3.33
Tracie Luong
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.29
Madeleine Clark
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.25
Mary Anderson
published
Jacqueline Maloney
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.19
Maria Alvarez
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
Amy Peinado
published 3.5
3.14
Elizabeth Coryell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.06
Nina Sheridan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.05
Molly Shiels
published
3.00
Megan Myers
published
2.98
Sarah Howard
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.92
Melissa Mountain
published
2.90
Kelsey Rasmussen
published
2.88
Emily Kitts
published 3
2.86
Sonal Patel
published
2.82
Ashley Brasier
published 3
2.78
Ariana Ling
published 3
Feyna Oman
published 3
2.70
Bonnie Makovec
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.49
Barbara Bernard
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.30
Jacqueline Bender
published 2.5
Julia Lowery
published
Kristine Delagnes
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Paula Romanovsky
published
Tricia Decker
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Madeleine Clark + Kelsey Rasmussen5165% games+9.3% vs expected
Mary Anderson + Ashley Brasier303 matchesnot enough data
Emily Kitts + Nina Sheridan123 matchesnot enough data
Sonal Patel + Megan Myers123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Elizabeth Lougee
23W–31L career · no lines in 2025
68%32%<1%
3.44
Tracie Luong
3W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
1%89%10%
3.33
Madeleine Clark
22W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%1%99%
3.29
Mary Anderson
25W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%2%98%
3.25
3.5
Jacqueline Maloney
0W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Maria Alvarez
7W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Amy Peinado
2W–6L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Elizabeth Coryell
1W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
14%86%<1%
3.14
Nina Sheridan
3W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
32%68%<1%
3.06
Molly Shiels
13W–15L career · no lines in 2025
<1%35%65%
3.05
Megan Myers
9W–14L career · no lines in 2025
<1%51%49%
3.00
Sarah Howard
6W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%55%44%
2.98
Melissa Mountain
3W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
2.92
Kelsey Rasmussen
10W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%78%21%
2.90
3
Emily Kitts
10W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
2.88
Sonal Patel
7W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%86%13%
2.86
3
Ashley Brasier
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
1%91%9%
2.82
3
Ariana Ling
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%5%
2.78
3
Feyna Oman
0W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Bonnie Makovec
5W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
6%93%1%
2.70
3
Barbara Bernard
1W–3L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
52%48%<1%
2.49
2.5
Jacqueline Bender
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
0%93%7%
2.30
Julia Lowery
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kristine Delagnes
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Paula Romanovsky
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Tricia Decker
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.