Teams

B8 Burkwood Clark

2021 Richmond Adult 40 & Over Weekend · Richmond Adult 40 & Over Women 3.5

8 players · average NTRP 3.40 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-08-14vs B2 ACAC Naylor/HoeferLost 01
L#1 DoublesVirginia Bowie / Donna Mourtzakis vs Kathie Naylor / Alicia Watkins2-6, 0-6
2021-08-08vs B5 Raintree StahlingWon 10
W#1 DoublesDonna Mourtzakis / Modestine Carter vs Anne Sansom / Lilia Dietz7-5, 6-1
2021-07-24vs B7 Southampton BrownLost 01
L#1 DoublesModestine Carter / Virginia Bowie vs Beth Morris / Helen Landry0-6, 3-6
2021-07-17vs B1 ACAC NeumannWon 10
W#1 DoublesModestine Carter / Virginia Bowie vs Dorothy Hillgrove / Valerie Stephens6-4, 1-3, 1-0
2021-07-10vs B4 SCC Sal’s Berries TornabeneWon 10
W#1 DoublesModestine Carter / Virginia Bowie vs Jessica Steinour / Ashley Raphael4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2021-06-26vs B2 ACAC Naylor/HoeferWon 10
W#1 DoublesDonna Mourtzakis / Modestine Carter vs Dawn Toft / Denise Weisberg6-1, 6-4
2021-06-22vs B6 MRTC Hawley Battery Park 3.5Split 11
W#1 DoublesDonna Mourtzakis / Modestine Carter vs Carolyn Hawley / Jessica Stephens6-0, 6-2
L#3 DoublesAnn Abernathy / Virginia Bowie vs Shelly Galles / Noelle Crews3-6, 2-5
2021-06-19vs B5 Raintree StahlingWon 10
W#1 DoublesModestine Carter / Virginia Bowie vs Valerie Caldwell / Carolyn Moncure6-2, 5-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 40 & Over Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.03 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Modestine Carter
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.22
Virginia Bowie
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.07
Donna Mourtzakis
published 3.5
2.98
2.90
Ann Abernathy
published 3
2.85
Mary Spagnolo
published
2.70
Carolyn Shute
published 3
Kathleen Stull
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Virginia Bowie + Modestine Carter311159% games−0.5% vs expected
Donna Mourtzakis + Virginia Bowie213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Modestine Carter
219W–132L career · 7 lines in 2021
50%50%<1%
3.50
3.5
Virginia Bowie
100W–71L career · 6 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Donna Mourtzakis
14W–15L career · no lines in 2021
31%69%<1%
3.07
Teresa Landes-Shuler
2W–6L career · no lines in 2021
55%45%<1%
2.98
3
Ann Abernathy
13W–5L career · no lines in 2021
<1%79%21%
2.90
Mary Spagnolo
7W–21L career · no lines in 2021
<1%87%13%
2.85
3
Carolyn Shute
10W–13L career · no lines in 2021
6%93%1%
2.70
Kathleen Stull
0W–4L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.