Teams

BC-IndependencePark/NicholasAmbrosio

2023 Adult 18 & Over - Beach Cities · BC Men - 4.5

12 players · average NTRP 4.60 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-06-03Won 10
W#2 DoublesNicholas Ambrosio / Raymond Thai vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-05-20vs BC-WestEnd/DaltonCoonSplit 11
W#2 DoublesJonathan Tsang / Eli Alejo vs Adi Hyttenberg / Michael Vogt6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesNicholas Ambrosio / Simon Ketema vs Jason Hanakeawe / Gordon Davis4-6, 6-1, 0-1
2023-05-13vs BC-WestEnd/KeithOshiroLost 12
L#1 DoublesHoward Lin / Jonathan Tsang vs Justin DeMattos / Christopher Dalton2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesEli Alejo / Mathew Gonzales vs Dominic Juneau / Daniel Hying1-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesAndrew Johnson vs Shubham Waldiya6-1, 6-2
2023-04-29vs BC-LLW-MiraCosta/TonyHsuLost 02
L#2 SinglesAndrew Johnson vs Michael Scovotti6-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesNicholas Ambrosio / Jonathan Chen vs Kevin Wang / Daniel Keolasy2-6, 2-6
2023-04-22vs BC-WestEnd/RogerKodaniWon 10
W#2 DoublesNicholas Ambrosio / Simon Ketema vs Patrick Condon / Koichi Ishihara6-3, 6-2
2023-04-15vs BC-MCC/EricSmithWon 10
W#1 DoublesMathew Gonzales / Eli Alejo vs Scott Brown / Andrew Radden6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2023-04-01vs BC-Kramer/JoePiccirilloWon 20
W#1 SinglesAndrew Johnson vs John Post6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesNitai Chokshi / Jonathan Tsang vs Rudy Lara / Scott Kebschull6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for BC Men - 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.06 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Andrew Johnson
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 5
Carmelo Tuldanes
published 5
4.43
EDWARD CHOI
published
4.25
Eli Alejo
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.98
Nicholas Ambrosio
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.93
Simon Ketema
published
3.88
Anthony Hean
published 4
3.87
Jonathan Tsang
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Hea Kim
published
James Lucero
published
Mathew Gonzales
published
Steven Huynh
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jonathan Tsang + Eli Alejo2447% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Andrew Johnson
26W–9L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
5
Carmelo Tuldanes
5W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
EDWARD CHOI
4W–9L career · no lines in 2023
no projection at this level
4.43
4.5
Eli Alejo
97W–73L career · 3 lines in 2023
4%93%4%
4.25
4.5
Nicholas Ambrosio
90W–53L career · 4 lines in 2023
56%44%<1%
3.98
Simon Ketema
4W–1L career · no lines in 2023
<1%69%31%
3.93
4
Anthony Hean
4W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
3.88
Jonathan Tsang
50W–47L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%82%18%
3.87
Hea Kim
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
James Lucero
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Mathew Gonzales
3W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Steven Huynh
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.