Teams

Br.Kaulback40A

2024 Capital Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Men

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-04-22vs Ke.Lesher40A3.5Lost 02
L#1 SinglesJonathan Drum vs Youngjun Lee0-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesBrian Kaulback / Cameron Burch vs Steve Schinkel / Kenneth Lesher6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2024-04-15vs Da.Huffman40ALost 01
L#3 DoublesBrian Kaulback / Chad Sokol vs John Agnew / David Hodl6-7, 4-6
2024-04-08vs De.Meares40ALost 01
L#1 DoublesJonathan Drum / Scott Hoffman vs Alan Melichar / John van Campen6-7, 6-7
2024-04-01vs Jo.Hulicki40ALost 01
L#3 DoublesChad Sokol / Michael Campbell vs Craig Fishbough / Spence Huffstetler3-6, 6-7
2024-03-18vs Art.Dec40AWon 10
W#3 DoublesChad Sokol / Michael Campbell vs Bryan Lowrance / Paul Baggett6-1, 6-4
2024-03-11vs Gr.Beyer40ASplit 11
L#2 DoublesBrian Kaulback / Scott Hoffman vs Emanuele Michi / Jason Swank6-4, 0-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesChad Sokol / Cameron Burch vs Darian Spell / Scott Stutts6-1, 7-5
2024-03-04vs Jo.Nance40ALost 01
L#1 DoublesJonathan Drum / Douglas Marks vs Michael Ball / Preston Waldo4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.62
Cameron Burch
published 3.5
3.60
Tyler Priest
published
3.44
Scott Hoffman
published
3.42
Jonathan Drum
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.29
Bill Green
published 3.5
3.27
Todd Blevins
published
3.27
Douglas Marks
published
3.14
Mark Zimmerman
published
3.13
Brian Kaulback
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.13
Darshan Patel
published 3.5
3.11
Michael Campbell
published
3.06
Chad Sokol
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.00
Dan Schaefer
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brian Kaulback + Chad Sokol1543% gamesnot enough data
Todd Blevins + Bill Green224 matchesnot enough data
Jonathan Drum + Cameron Burch213 matchesnot enough data
Mark Zimmerman + Bill Green303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cameron Burch
47W–14L career · no lines in 2024
<1%20%80%
3.62
Tyler Priest
4W–12L career · no lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
3.60
Scott Hoffman
15W–14L career · no lines in 2024
<1%65%34%
3.44
3.5
Jonathan Drum
102W–110L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%71%29%
3.42
3.5
Bill Green
19W–13L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.29
Todd Blevins
12W–17L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%5%
3.27
Douglas Marks
4W–15L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.27
Mark Zimmerman
7W–16L career · no lines in 2024
16%84%1%
3.14
3.5
Brian Kaulback
51W–67L career · 3 lines in 2024
17%82%<1%
3.13
3.5
Darshan Patel
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
3.13
Michael Campbell
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
3.11
3.5
Chad Sokol
36W–70L career · 4 lines in 2024
35%65%<1%
3.06
3.5
Dan Schaefer
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
49%51%<1%
3.00

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.