Teams

Julich

2026 18&Over Women Manhattan · Open Women

9 players · average NTRP 5.50 / METROPOLITAN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-06-28vs Glick/StewartSplit 11
W#1 DoublesRia Gerger / Madison Rhyner vs Solomiya Zinko / Lindsey Hodge7-5, 5-5
L#2 DoublesCampbell Cooper / Diana Tkachenko vs Madison Stevens / Adrienne Haynes3-6, 1-6
2026-06-04vs Glick/StewartLost 12
L#1 DoublesIveta Daujotaite / Campbell Cooper vs Lindsey Hodge / Leighann Sahagun2-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesRia Gerger vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesDiana Tkachenko / Sarah Bowen vs Kathy Wang / Chelsea Kung2-6, 4-6
2026-05-31vs Glick/StewartLost 03
L#1 DoublesMadison Rhyner / Lucia Hoffman vs Lindsey Hodge / Solomiya Zinko1-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesDiana Tkachenko vs Sloane Morra3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSarah Bowen / Jean-Na Koo vs Madison Stevens / Kathy Wang3-6, 3-6
2026-05-13vs Glick/StewartSplit 11
L#1 DoublesRia Gerger / Iveta Daujotaite vs Shinann Featherston / Lauren McHale4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSarah Bowen / Madison Rhyner vs Solomiya Zinko / Adrienne Haynes7-6, 6-0
2026-05-06vs Glick/StewartLost 01
L#1 DoublesSarah Bowen / Ria Gerger vs Shinann Featherston / Lauren McHale2-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Open Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.59 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

5.40
Diana Tkachenko
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 6
Campbell Cooper
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 5
4.58
Sarah Bowen
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
4.37
Jean-Na Koo
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.31
Lena Arafa
usually #1 Singles 86%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published
4.27
Lucia Hoffman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Iveta Daujotaite
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Madison Rhyner
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Ria Gerger
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

6
Diana Tkachenko
0W–3L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
76%24%<1%
5.40
5
Campbell Cooper
0W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Sarah Bowen
50W–23L career · 4 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.58
Jean-Na Koo
16W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
no projection at this level
4.37
Lena Arafa
32W–39L career · 7 lines in 2026
1%90%8%
4.31
Lucia Hoffman
7W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
3%92%5%
4.27
Iveta Daujotaite
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Madison Rhyner
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Ria Gerger
28W–15L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.