Teams

Smith

2025 CVTA USTA Adult 18 & Over - Fall '24 · Men 4.0

9 players · average NTRP 4.00 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-11-10vs CVTA/Dave DawsonLost 12
W#1 DoublesMatthew Smith / Bob Gossman vs Dave Dawson / Jonathan Mize4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJoseph Cheriyampurathu / Chase Still vs Dallas Sizemore / Mark Lignell3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesEddie Stokes / Danny McGhee vs Barry Owen / Casey Reemsnyder3-6, 3-6
2024-10-29vs CVTA/Dave DawsonWon 21
W#1 DoublesMatthew Smith / Danny McGhee vs Dave Dawson / Barry Owen7-6, 6-2
W#1 SinglesJJ Huynh vs Dallas Sizemore7-5, 6-2
L#2 SinglesJoseph Cheriyampurathu vs Avery Cornett1-6, 1-6
2024-10-29vs CVTA/Dave DawsonSplit 22
W#1 DoublesMatthew Smith / Chase Still vs Barry Owen / Dave Dawson7-5, 6-2
L#1 SinglesTaylor Willingham vs JJ Huynh6-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesEddie Stokes / Danny McGhee vs Chandler Williams / Casey Reemsnyder3-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesJoseph Robbins vs John Stoicoff6-3, 6-0
2024-10-15Lost 01
L#2 DoublesEddie Stokes / Jeff Barnes vs Taylor Willingham / Chandler Williams3-6, 3-6
2024-10-09vs CVTA/Dave DawsonLost 01
L#1 DoublesMatthew Smith / Jeff Barnes vs Dave Dawson / Barry Owen1-6, 6-7
2024-10-02Won 10
W#3 DoublesJeff Barnes / Matthew Smith vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.54 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.74
Bob Gossman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.72
Taylor Willingham
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.68
Danny McGhee
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.49
Chase Still
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.34
Jeff Barnes
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.29
Joseph Robbins
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
JJ Huynh
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Joseph Cheriyampurathu
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Michael Landry
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Bob Gossman
12W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%3%
3.74
Taylor Willingham
4W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Danny McGhee
3W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
4
Chase Still
16W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
52%48%<1%
3.49
Jeff Barnes
76W–59L career · 3 lines in 2025
87%13%<1%
3.34
Joseph Robbins
12W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
93%7%<1%
3.29
JJ Huynh
3W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Joseph Cheriyampurathu
2W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Michael Landry
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.