← Teams

SAC-Hummel/Brady

2025 Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Women

3 players · average NTRP 2.83 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.61 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.78
Lina Gao
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3
2.60
Lori Andersen
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.44
Natasha Brady
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3
Results8 ties
2025-03-15Lost 0–2
L#1 SinglesLori Andersen vs Marissa Franck6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesLina Gao / Susan Wang vs Heather Selis / Deborah Cohen6-2, 6-3
2025-03-09Won 2–1
L#1 SinglesLina Gao vs Robyn Hilden6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesNatasha Brady / Yan Li vs Sarah Wang / Becky Coder7-6, 7-5
W#3 DoublesPujitha Davuluri / Lori Andersen vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-02-28Lost 0–2
L#1 SinglesLina Gao vs Ying Deng6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesNatasha Brady / Jody Yates vs Emily Nordstrom / Angie Keam7-6, 6-2
2025-02-23Lost 0–1
L#2 DoublesNatasha Brady / Lori Andersen vs Joanna Asia Wagner / Thao Nguyen7-6, 6-2
2025-02-15Lost 0–2
L#2 DoublesJanet Hummel / Lori Andersen vs Rose Lee / Nora Gray6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesLori Farrell / Lina Gao vs Thao Nguyen / Elizabeth Fox6-1, 6-4
2025-02-02Lost 0–2
L#2 DoublesNatasha Brady / Janet Hummel vs Carmen Warda / Lisa McBee6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesLori Andersen / Pujitha Davuluri vs Autumn Bunch / Susanne Cochran6-0, 7-5
2025-01-25Lost 0–1
L#2 DoublesLina Gao / Natasha Brady vs Sumi Kim / Jane Moffat6-4, 6-2
2025-01-05Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesNatasha Brady / Michelle Roach vs Julia Henry / Karin Owens6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesLori Andersen / Jody Yates vs Carol Glenn / Roxanna Johnson6-4, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3
Lina Gao
46W–86L career
0%100%0%
2.78
2.5
Lori Andersen
31W–87L career
0%10%90%
2.60
3
Natasha Brady
33W–101L career
51%49%0%
2.44

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.