Teams

S-LMOrtiz/River Run

2022 Lake 18 & Over Summer Singles · Women 4.0

8 players · average NTRP 3.80 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-07-26vs S-LBBoucher/JettonWon 20
W#1 SinglesPhebby Benton vs Sandy McAlpine6-4, 6-2
W#2 SinglesTerri Utz vs Lisa Wilkens6-4, 6-4
2022-07-19vs S-LTPersinger/PenWon 10
W#3 SinglesJanet Szilagyi vs Kira Skill6-2, 6-0
2022-07-05Won 10
W#2 SinglesJanet Szilagyi vs Jennifer Jenkins6-4, 6-2
2022-06-28vs S-LTPersinger/PenSplit 11
W#1 SinglesAna Endsjo vs Ming Keadle7-5, 7-5
L#3 SinglesMeredith Ortiz vs Kira Skill5-7, 2-6
2022-06-19vs S-LBBoucher/JettonWon 30
W#1 SinglesAna Endsjo vs Jennifer Jenkins6-0, 6-2
W#2 SinglesMeredith Ortiz vs Llnon North7-6, 6-3
W#3 SinglesTerri Utz vs Lisa Wilkens7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2022-06-07vs S-LTPersinger/PenWon 21
L#1 SinglesAna Endsjo vs Yin Chee Chin3-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesPhebby Benton vs Elizabeth Foreman6-4, 6-3
W#3 SinglesMeredith Ortiz vs Laura Engel7-6, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Janet Szilagyi
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 4
3.75
Phebby Benton
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4
3.58
Ana Endsjo
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.54
Kathleen Navola
published
3.39
Patricia Sharawy
published
3.34
Meredith Ortiz
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.33
Jennife Roberts
published
3.09
Terri Utz
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ana Endsjo + Phebby Benton9552% gamesnot enough data
Terri Utz + Meredith Ortiz10255% gamesnot enough data
Ana Endsjo + Terri Utz123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Janet Szilagyi
196W–83L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%89%11%
3.84
4
Phebby Benton
170W–72L career · 2 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Ana Endsjo
112W–98L career · 3 lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
3.58
Kathleen Navola
0W–4L career · no lines in 2022
38%62%<1%
3.54
Patricia Sharawy
1W–5L career · no lines in 2022
81%19%<1%
3.39
3.5
Meredith Ortiz
123W–106L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%89%11%
3.34
Jennife Roberts
5W–1L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Terri Utz
105W–92L career · 2 lines in 2022
24%76%<1%
3.09

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.