Teams

FLEX-Peterson-YTC

2024 Auburn Flex League Spring · Tuesday Night FLEX - Men

13 players · average NTRP 3.30 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Tuesday Night FLEX - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.88 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Andrew Vitu
published 3.5
3.20
Bret Peterson
published 4
3.12
George Crandell
published
3.06
Mal Sport
published
2.96
Lamar Daniels III
published
2.90
Lincoln Wang
published
2.80
Hongbiao Wang
published
2.80
Deming Wang
published 3
Bob Reynods
published 3
2.58
David Wahlig
published 3
2.55
Parker van Dyke
published
Haitham Eletrabi
published
Vince Hume
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Haitham Eletrabi + Lincoln Wang3455% games+14.0% vs expected
Hongbiao Wang + Deming Wang8554% games−3.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Andrew Vitu
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Bret Peterson
11W–11L career · no lines in 2024
98%2%<1%
3.20
George Crandell
14W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%21%79%
3.12
Mal Sport
8W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%34%66%
3.06
Lamar Daniels III
21W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%62%38%
2.96
Lincoln Wang
4W–6L career · no lines in 2024
76%24%<1%
2.90
Hongbiao Wang
11W–9L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
2.80
3
Deming Wang
10W–11L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
2.80
3
Bob Reynods
3W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3
David Wahlig
2W–5L career · no lines in 2024
27%73%<1%
2.58
Parker van Dyke
3W–10L career · no lines in 2024
36%64%<1%
2.55
Haitham Eletrabi
4W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Vince Hume
0W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.