Teams

Scarborough

2026 SUMMER Tri Level · 2026 Summer Tri Level 4.0

8 players · average NTRP 4.50 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-07-10vs ElysiumWon 21
L#1 DoublesDevin Boyer / Casey Cempre vs Andrew Codita / Arthur Bord3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesBradley Strawser / Ryan Shutt vs Adam Ewing / Matt Larsen6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAaron Gilbert / Paul Mazak vs Sean Brown / Todd Glover6-3, 6-1
2026-06-28vs New GenWon 30
W#1 DoublesBlaine Carr / R Pepino vs Gabe Fogle / Jack Schadek7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesCasey Cempre / Bradley Strawser vs Tito Bonadonna / Brady Pema6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMilan Jovanovic / Paul Mazak vs Harsh Bakshi / Andrew Esposito7-6, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2026 Summer Tri Level 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.31 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.77
Blaine Carr
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.64
Bradley Strawser
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.57
Casey Cempre
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.29
Ryan Shutt
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.28
R Pepino
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.04
Paul Mazak
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.98
Aaron Gilbert
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.95
Milan Jovanovic
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bradley Strawser + R Pepino17171% games+9.3% vs expected
Aaron Gilbert + Milan Jovanovic5163% gamesnot enough data
Bradley Strawser + Blaine Carr404 matchesnot enough data
Bradley Strawser + Milan Jovanovic123 matchesnot enough data
Bradley Strawser + Ryan Shutt303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Blaine Carr
19W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
no projection at this level
4.77
4.5
Bradley Strawser
69W–9L career · type A · 2 lines in 2026
<1%17%83%
4.64
4.5
Casey Cempre
35W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%31%69%
4.57
Ryan Shutt
36W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%2%98%
4.29
R Pepino
32W–18L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%2%98%
4.28
Paul Mazak
44W–20L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%40%60%
4.04
4
Aaron Gilbert
80W–15L career · type A · 1 line in 2026
<1%55%45%
3.98
Milan Jovanovic
144W–91L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%65%35%
3.95

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.