Teams

MLohnes/DJohnson (Park Road)

2025 Mixed Doubles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Mixed 4.5 - Wed PM

11 players · average NTRP 4.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-07-23vs DJKarasik (Queens)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesMadison Lohnes / Joshua Mu vs Callie Schmit / Anthony Yang4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesMaria Emilia de la Orden / Darnaye Black vs Jackie Gaine / Alex Kiser3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMarcus Wege / Kimberly Diaz vs Irma Laney / Christopher Love2-6, 3-6
2025-07-02vs DJKarasik (Queens)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMadison Lohnes / Sahil Vasa vs Callie Schmit / Chase Lyles6-7, 3-6
L#1 DoublesMadison Lohnes / Sahil Vasa vs Cassandra Wincek / Anatoly Zelepouga1-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesBridget Johnson / Marcus Wege vs Christopher Gardner / Toni Laney2-6, 5-7
2025-06-11vs DJKarasik (Queens)Split 11
W#2 DoublesChris Bauer / Madison Lohnes vs Brittany Simpson / Luke Mixon7-5, 6-3
L#3 DoublesMarcus Wege / Bridget Johnson vs Chase Lyles / Jennifer Anderson6-3, 0-6, 0-1
2025-05-28vs CGardner/AZelepouga (Mason Wallace)Split 11
W#1 DoublesMadison Lohnes / Sahil Vasa vs Christopher Love / Toni Laney2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDarnaye Black / Charlotte Gillum vs Maggie Connolly / John Reid3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Mixed 4.5 - Wed PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.18 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.52
Charlotte Gillum
published 4.5
4.42
Chris Bauer
published 4.5
4.35
Madison Lohnes
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.23
Sahil Vasa
published
4.21
Marcus Wege
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.20
Bridget Johnson
published 4.5
4.20
4.10
Ana Bolson
published 4.5
4.05
Darnaye Black
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.92
Joshua Mu
published
3.81
Kimberly Diaz
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Charlotte Gillum
12W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%44%56%
4.52
4.5
Chris Bauer
19W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
4.42
4.5
Madison Lohnes
73W–37L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%85%14%
4.35
Sahil Vasa
13W–6L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
4.23
4.5
Marcus Wege
88W–46L career · 3 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
4.21
4.5
Bridget Johnson
9W–6L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%2%
4.20
Maria Emilia de la Orden
17W–9L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%2%
4.20
4.5
Ana Bolson
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
4.10
4.5
Darnaye Black
116W–60L career · 2 lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
4.05
Joshua Mu
32W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.92
Kimberly Diaz
18W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%1%99%
3.81

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.