Teams

Over&In

2022 Montgomery Adult 18 & Over Spring · Montgomery Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.42 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-06-26vs Hazel-ThomasLost 02
L#1 SinglesBronwen Williams vs Millette Miller0-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesGay Trinkner vs Maureen Cook3-6, 0-6
2022-06-23vs Cosmic Strings 18Lost 01
L#3 DoublesBronwen Williams / Karen Vogel vs Melissa Hayes-Gehrke / Kate Carr0-6, 3-6
2022-06-05vs Hazel-ThomasLost 01
L#3 DoublesGay Trinkner / Anto Faini vs Maureen Cook / Frances Brennan3-6, 1-6
2022-04-30vs Cosmic Strings 18Won 10
W#3 DoublesAmber Surmiller / Gay Trinkner vs Carey Greenauer / Bhanu Rajput6-4, 6-6
2022-04-22vs NKOTBLost 01
L#3 DoublesAnto Faini / Gay Trinkner vs Miyuki Sato / Maria Angelica Camp3-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.39 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Lucy Wang
published
3.76
Layna Kelly
published
3.74
Winny Zhang
published
3.68
Jelena Mitrovic
published
3.65
Anto Faini
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published 3.5
3.56
Sandy Thongphok
published 3.5
3.23
Amber Surmiller
published 3.5
3.21
Linda Shaffer
published
3.20
3.19
De'Ana Dow
published 3.5
3.16
Laura McNay
published
3.08
Gay Trinkner
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.73
Bronwen Williams
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laura McNay + Linda Shaffer4257% games+6.9% vs expected
Sandy Thongphok + Anto Faini131152% games−1.5% vs expected
Gay Trinkner + Anto Faini5255% gamesnot enough data
Sandy Thongphok + Jelena Mitrovic314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lucy Wang
33W–16L career · no lines in 2022
88%12%<1%
3.85
Layna Kelly
43W–21L career · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.76
Winny Zhang
19W–18L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.74
Jelena Mitrovic
9W–11L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.68
3.5
Anto Faini
227W–104L career · 8 lines in 2022
<1%12%88%
3.65
3.5
Sandy Thongphok
277W–124L career · no lines in 2022
<1%33%67%
3.56
3.5
Amber Surmiller
22W–37L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
Linda Shaffer
18W–17L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.21
Ruth Go Fernando Randle
21W–18L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
De'Ana Dow
3W–6L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
Laura McNay
5W–6L career · no lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
3.16
3.5
Gay Trinkner
228W–205L career · 9 lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
3.08
3
Bronwen Williams
109W–99L career · 2 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
2.73

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.