WHRC-Lipke

2018 Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Men

14 players · average NTRP 3.57 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Scouting

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

—

Shane Kim

published 4

3.69

Stefan Olander

published 4

3.34

Janis Locenieks

published 3.5

3.32

Frank Foti

published 3.5

3.31

Jeff Lipke

published 3.5

3.30

Bill Lowblad

published 3.5

3.28

Bryan Shieh

published 3.5

3.26

Neville Mehta

published 3.5

—

Bing Hu

published 3.5

—

Kerry Jantzi

published 3.5

—

Richard Press

published 3.5

—

Thor Deacon

published 3.5

3.21

Sandeep Mashru

published 3.5

3.14

Simon Lofts

published 3.5

Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

Shane Kim

27W–28L career

not enough data

—

Stefan Olander

53W–37L career

7%92%1%

3.69

3.5

Janis Locenieks

41W–21L career

2%89%9%

3.34

3.5

Frank Foti

20W–21L career

3%90%7%

3.32

3.5

Jeff Lipke

106W–86L career

0%99%1%

3.31

3.5

Bill Lowblad

92W–61L career

1%97%2%

3.30

3.5

Bryan Shieh

44W–48L career

3%95%3%

3.28

3.5

Neville Mehta

113W–80L career

0%99%0%

3.26

3.5

Bing Hu

2W–5L career

not enough data

—

3.5

Kerry Jantzi

33W–38L career

not enough data

—

3.5

Richard Press

13W–23L career

not enough data

—

3.5

Thor Deacon

36W–39L career

not enough data

—

3.5

Sandeep Mashru

3W–7L career · type S

11%85%3%

3.21

3.5

Simon Lofts

35W–53L career

12%88%0%

3.14

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.